LogoLogo
  • Introduction
    • 🄳Welcome to the playbook
    • šŸ“’Project background
    • What is co-operative care?
    • šŸ› ļøHow to use the playbook
    • A word from...
      • Equal Care
      • Clapton Care Commons
  • Start and Grow
    • 🚠Overview
    • šŸŒFoundation
      • Founders
      • Find the others
      • Feasibility
      • Formation
    • Have a go
    • Find (more) money
    • Share the power
    • šŸŽ‹Grow
      • Recruit workers
      • Start teams
    • Sustain
  • Technology
    • Equal Care's Platform
    • Equal Care's technology journey
    • Choosing technologies
      • Social Care Platform Vendors
  • Fundraising
    • Fundraising options
    • Community Share Offers
      • Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
    • Commons Contribution
    • Restrictions on investment
  • Equal Care's Model
    • Our Purpose
    • How we work
    • Sociocracy
    • Circles
      • Long term decisions
      • Everyday decisions
      • Circle records
      • Consent
      • Proposals
    • Teams
      • Why we use the Teams model
      • Who's in?
      • Team Starting
        • The role of a Team Starter
        • 1. Starting a Team: The First Contact
        • 2. Beginning the Relationship
        • 3. Finding the Right Match
        • 4. Supportive Conversation & Trust Assessment
          • 4a. Example of a Supportive Conversation
          • 4b. Example of a Trust Assessment
        • 5. Profiles and promises
          • 5a. The Getting Support Promise
          • 5b. The Getting Support Profile
          • 5c. Worker and team member profiles
        • 6. Building a team
          • 6a. Finding and welcoming new members
          • 6b. Trialling new team members
        • 7. Getting Organised: Roles and Hats
        • 8. Stepping Back: Team Independence
      • Dealing with conflict and change
        • Conflict support
        • How to leave a team well
    • Hats
      • Team Hats
      • Circle Hats - Process
      • Circle Hats - Operational
        • Care Commons Organiser
        • Peer supervisor
    • Platform
    • Co-production
      • Implementing co-production
      • Context of co-production in social care
      • Governance for co-production
      • Ownership for co-production
    • Care Commons
    • Radical Candour
  • Evaluation framework
    • Introduction
    • Commons-based Care: the Context
    • Scope
      • Three Domains of Care Outcomes: Process, Change, and Maintenance.
      • Three Domains of Outcomes in Equal Care
      • Mapping Equal Care Outputs to Outcomes Domains
      • Social Climate as a Key Evaluative Lens
    • Evaluation Challenges
    • Methods
      • Social Climate Survey
      • Community Mapping
      • Interviews and workshops
      • Group activities
      • Community needs assessment
        • Locality analysis
    • Data Analysis
      • Interviews Outcome Domains
        • Growth Outcomes
        • Well-being, Relationships & Belonging Outcomes
        • Systems Maintenaince & Co-production Outcomes
      • Community Network Map: Analysis & Overview
        • Who’s in the Network?
        • Bridging the Gap Between Formal and Informal Care
        • Mapping Care Wealth
        • What We Learned from the Teams
        • The Role of Teams in the Community Care Network
        • Reflections and Future Directions
      • Reflections from the Ground: Insights from Key Circle Leads
        • Circle Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Teams Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Platform Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Commons Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
          • Care Commons Organiser Role Description
    • The Toolbox
      • Theory of Change
        • What is a Theory of Change?
          • Using a Theory of Change
        • Co-producing our Theory of Change
        • Observations about ToC Outcomes
        • How to use our interactive ToC
          • Orientation to ToC Tool: The Kumu Platform
            • Using the focus function in Kumu
            • Using Basic Control Functions
            • Toggling Between views
          • 1. Outputs Dimensions and Outcome Domains
          • 2. Coop Output Dimensions - a deeper dive.
          • 3. Coop Outcomes Domains. A deeper dive.
        • Using ToC tool to understand our model of care: Key Outputs.
        • Using ToC tool to understand our model of care: Key Outcomes
        • Using ToC tool to see how we measure outcomes
        • Using ToC tool to understand the impact of specific features of the coop
          • Circle ToC
          • Platform ToC
          • Teams ToC
          • Commons ToC
        • Using this tool for Strategy and Planning
      • Equal Care Coop's Social Climate Survey
        • About Equal Care's Social Climate
          • Why Measure Social Climate?
        • Interpreting Growth Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Interpreting Systems Maintenance and Co-production Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Interpreting Well-being, Relationships & Belonging Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Using the Social Climate Survey: Resources and Challenges.
        • List of Survey Items for all Stake Holders
      • Community Care Mapping Tool
      • Interview Templates
      • Atlas Care Maps
      • Co-Production Capacity Assessment Tool
        • 10 capacities for co-production
        • Using the tool
  • Service Specification
    • Care as a common pool resource
    • Service Spec
    • Service Map
  • Cost Model
    • Introduction
    • Resources
    • Fair wages
    • Cost Models in Social Care
  • Resources
    • Co-op operations
      • Communications
        • Roles
        • Tone of Voice
        • Digital Inclusion
        • Social Media
      • Learning
        • What you need to know
        • Peer to peer learning
    • Documentation
    • Care and Support Rates
    • Co-op rules & bylaws
    • Care Mapping with Atlas of Care
      • Care Mapping for Relationship-Centred Care
      • Care Mapping for new Teams
      • Care Mapping for Evaluation
    • Glossary
Powered by GitBook

Ā© Equal Care Co-op Ltd 2025

On this page
  • The Homecare Association
  • LaingBuisson
  • ADASS (Association of Directors of Adults Social Services)

Was this helpful?

Export as PDF
  1. Cost Model

Cost Models in Social Care

The following was written by Equal Care's Treasurer Vivek Nanda during our research to create the cost model within this playbook.

PreviousFair wagesNextCo-op operations

Last updated 11 months ago

Was this helpful?

In section 4.31 of Care and support statutory guidance - GOV.UK it says:

"When commissioning services, local authorities should assure themselves and have evidence that contract terms, conditions and fee levels for care and support services are appropriate to provide the delivery of the agreed care packages with agreed quality of care.

This should support and promote the wellbeing of people who receive care and support, and allow for the service provider ability to meet statutory obligations to pay at least the national minimum wage and provide effective training and development of staff. It should also allow retention of staff commensurate with delivering services to the agreed quality, and encourage innovation and improvement.

Local authorities should have regard to guidance on minimum fee levels necessary to provide this assurance, taking account of the local economic environment. This assurance should understand that reasonable fee levels allow for a reasonable rate of return by independent providers that is sufficient to allow the overall pool of efficient providers to remain sustainable in the long term.

It goes on to cite three cost model tools as "helpful as examples of possible approaches:"

  • UKHCA Minimum Price for Homecare

  • Laing and Buisson toolkit to understand fair price for residential care

  • ADASS paying for care calculator

Each of these tool point to the leading suppliers of cost models that the UK Government is signposting to local authorities.

The Homecare Association

The most detailed and free source of information is the latest incarnation of ā€œUKHCA Minimum Price for Homecareā€, which can be found here.

Using the calculations published by the Homecare Association for the last few years for the National Living Wage and the London Living Wage allows us to see the minimum level of prices that should be charged by an organisation providing a social care service in Yorkshire and London:

This shows that wages of Care Workers have been held below the rate at which other costs have been increasing, with their share of total costs decreasing from 44% in 2019-20 to 41% in 2023-24.

LaingBuisson

The most expensive report at £1,495 or more can be found at Homecare and Supported Living Market Report - 5th Edition - LaingBuisson.

The fifth edition of LaingBuisson’s Homecare and Supported Living UK Market Report is indispensable reading for anyone involved in this fragmented and complex market. Written by leading market commentator, William Laing, during the winter of 2022/23, the report includes fully updated data and market insights that accurately portray how the market has developed in the past 18 months following the Covid-19 pandemic.

The new report shows the value of the UK market for homecare and supported living to be Ā£11.5 billion (2021/22) and estimates that around 670,000 people are in receipt of homecare or supported services in the UK. These services, together, represent a strong intermediate step on the ā€˜ladder of care’, and are becoming more prominent as pressures on councils’ social care budgets see some care receivers shift from care home care to community-based homecare or supported living. The report also includes the findings of new research into ā€˜tech’ innovations that support the homecare and supported living sector, and social care generally. With the Covid-19 pandemic accelerating digitalisation across the sector, this has provided opportunities for tech-enabled independent sector providers to diversify and expand into a more central and more profitable role in integrated care systems.

What the report covers:

  • Market

  • Politics and Regulation

  • Payors

  • Major Providers

  • Investors

  • Staffing

  • Market Potential

ADASS (Association of Directors of Adults Social Services)

ADASS and Surrey County Council developed a tool for modelling the additional costs of care to Local Authorities arising from the Care and Support Bill in 2013/4 as the Care Act 2014 was going through Parliament. The Care Act 2014 aimed to overhaul the 60-year-old legislation regarding social care in England. An overview of the model can be found here.

A user guide for using the model can be found here.

As the implementation of this act has evolved, ADASS has continued to support Local Authorities with the financial implications. The most recent initiative by the UK Government has been to set up the Market Sustainability and Fair Cost of Care Fund 2022 to 2023 in order to help Local Authorities increase the pay of care staff and reduce the number of people with unmet needs. In order to receive their share of this fund, the government has required councils to undertake a ā€˜Cost of Care’ exercise with their local care providers and to publish the results on the 1st of February, 2023. The cost of care reports and market sustainability plans for most local authorities can be found at Cost of care reports and market sustainability plans by local authority - GOV.UK

These show that the median prices paid by Hackney Council are just 2% higher than those by Calderdale Council, and both are below the Minimum Price calculated by the Homecare Association for London and the rest of England: