LogoLogo
  • Introduction
    • 🥳Welcome to the playbook
    • 📒Project background
    • What is co-operative care?
    • 🛠️How to use the playbook
    • A word from...
      • Equal Care
      • Clapton Care Commons
  • Start and Grow
    • 🚠Overview
    • 🌍Foundation
      • Founders
      • Find the others
      • Feasibility
      • Formation
    • Have a go
    • Find (more) money
    • Share the power
    • 🎋Grow
      • Recruit workers
      • Start teams
    • Sustain
  • Technology
    • Equal Care's Platform
    • Equal Care's technology journey
    • Choosing technologies
      • Social Care Platform Vendors
  • Fundraising
    • Fundraising options
    • Community Share Offers
      • Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
    • Commons Contribution
    • Restrictions on investment
  • Equal Care's Model
    • Our Purpose
    • How we work
    • Sociocracy
    • Circles
      • Long term decisions
      • Everyday decisions
      • Circle records
      • Consent
      • Proposals
    • Teams
      • Why we use the Teams model
      • Who's in?
      • Team Starting
        • The role of a Team Starter
        • 1. Starting a Team: The First Contact
        • 2. Beginning the Relationship
        • 3. Finding the Right Match
        • 4. Supportive Conversation & Trust Assessment
          • 4a. Example of a Supportive Conversation
          • 4b. Example of a Trust Assessment
        • 5. Profiles and promises
          • 5a. The Getting Support Promise
          • 5b. The Getting Support Profile
          • 5c. Worker and team member profiles
        • 6. Building a team
          • 6a. Finding and welcoming new members
          • 6b. Trialling new team members
        • 7. Getting Organised: Roles and Hats
        • 8. Stepping Back: Team Independence
      • Dealing with conflict and change
        • Conflict support
        • How to leave a team well
    • Hats
      • Team Hats
      • Circle Hats - Process
      • Circle Hats - Operational
        • Care Commons Organiser
        • Peer supervisor
    • Platform
    • Co-production
      • Implementing co-production
      • Context of co-production in social care
      • Governance for co-production
      • Ownership for co-production
    • Care Commons
    • Radical Candour
  • Evaluation framework
    • Introduction
    • Commons-based Care: the Context
    • Scope
      • Three Domains of Care Outcomes: Process, Change, and Maintenance.
      • Three Domains of Outcomes in Equal Care
      • Mapping Equal Care Outputs to Outcomes Domains
      • Social Climate as a Key Evaluative Lens
    • Evaluation Challenges
    • Methods
      • Social Climate Survey
      • Community Mapping
      • Interviews and workshops
      • Group activities
      • Community needs assessment
        • Locality analysis
    • Data Analysis
      • Interviews Outcome Domains
        • Growth Outcomes
        • Well-being, Relationships & Belonging Outcomes
        • Systems Maintenaince & Co-production Outcomes
      • Community Network Map: Analysis & Overview
        • Who’s in the Network?
        • Bridging the Gap Between Formal and Informal Care
        • Mapping Care Wealth
        • What We Learned from the Teams
        • The Role of Teams in the Community Care Network
        • Reflections and Future Directions
      • Reflections from the Ground: Insights from Key Circle Leads
        • Circle Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Teams Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Platform Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Commons Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
          • Care Commons Organiser Role Description
    • The Toolbox
      • Theory of Change
        • What is a Theory of Change?
          • Using a Theory of Change
        • Co-producing our Theory of Change
        • Observations about ToC Outcomes
        • How to use our interactive ToC
          • Orientation to ToC Tool: The Kumu Platform
            • Using the focus function in Kumu
            • Using Basic Control Functions
            • Toggling Between views
          • 1. Outputs Dimensions and Outcome Domains
          • 2. Coop Output Dimensions - a deeper dive.
          • 3. Coop Outcomes Domains. A deeper dive.
        • Using ToC tool to understand our model of care: Key Outputs.
        • Using ToC tool to understand our model of care: Key Outcomes
        • Using ToC tool to see how we measure outcomes
        • Using ToC tool to understand the impact of specific features of the coop
          • Circle ToC
          • Platform ToC
          • Teams ToC
          • Commons ToC
        • Using this tool for Strategy and Planning
      • Equal Care Coop's Social Climate Survey
        • About Equal Care's Social Climate
          • Why Measure Social Climate?
        • Interpreting Growth Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Interpreting Systems Maintenance and Co-production Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Interpreting Well-being, Relationships & Belonging Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Using the Social Climate Survey: Resources and Challenges.
        • List of Survey Items for all Stake Holders
      • Community Care Mapping Tool
      • Interview Templates
      • Atlas Care Maps
      • Co-Production Capacity Assessment Tool
        • 10 capacities for co-production
        • Using the tool
  • Service Specification
    • Care as a common pool resource
    • Service Spec
    • Service Map
  • Cost Model
    • Introduction
    • Resources
    • Fair wages
    • Cost Models in Social Care
  • Resources
    • Co-op operations
      • Communications
        • Roles
        • Tone of Voice
        • Digital Inclusion
        • Social Media
      • Learning
        • What you need to know
        • Peer to peer learning
    • Documentation
    • Care and Support Rates
    • Co-op rules & bylaws
    • Care Mapping with Atlas of Care
      • Care Mapping for Relationship-Centred Care
      • Care Mapping for new Teams
      • Care Mapping for Evaluation
    • Glossary
Powered by GitBook

© Equal Care Co-op Ltd 2025

On this page
  • What Teams offer
  • What makes this different?
  • Why it matters

Was this helpful?

Export as PDF
  1. Equal Care's Model
  2. Teams

Why we use the Teams model

Putting relationships at the heart of care

PreviousTeamsNextWho's in?

Last updated 20 days ago

Was this helpful?

At Equal Care, we believe that care works best when it's built on trust, mutual respect, and meaningful relationships. That’s why we support people to form their own Teams: small, personalised groups made up of the people they choose to support them.

Rather than a rota planned in a distant office, or unfamiliar staff sent to your door, the Teams model gives control and connection back to where it belongs: with the people giving and receiving support.


What Teams offer

1. Real choice over who is in your life Team Owners (the people receiving support) choose who supports them. It might be family, friends, volunteers, or paid workers, and no one is added without mutual consent. This creates relationships that are chosen, not assigned.

2. Flexibility and responsiveness Because Teams agree arrangements directly with each other, it’s much easier to adapt. Need to move a visit or change how support is delivered? You don’t need to wait for someone in an office to approve it; you just talk to the people in your Team.

3. Shared responsibility, shared power Everyone in the Team contributes, including family members, friends, and peer supporters. Roles and responsibilities are made visible using "team hats" on our platform, which means unpaid work isn’t invisible, and everyone’s contribution is recognised.

4. Autonomy and dignity Team Owners are not treated like service users or patients. They lead their team to the extent they want to: shaping how things work, or delegating decisions if they prefer. The system fits the person, not the other way around.

5. Better support, built on knowledge Team members who know the person well are more likely to notice changes, get the details right, and respond appropriately - from the way someone likes their tea to signs that something’s not quite right.

6. A space for growth Teams offer space to learn: about each other, about care, and about how to work co-operatively. People build skills they might not have developed in more traditional care settings.


What makes this different?

The Teams model is a radical departure from most care agency models. Here's how it compares:

Traditional Care Agencies
Equal Care Teams

Limited or no choice in who supports you

Full choice and mutual consent on both sides

Rotas and changes decided in a central office

Teams decide together: directly and flexibly

Workers follow fixed instructions and times

Workers co-create support with the Team Owner

Administrative tasks are handled by someone outside the caring relationship

Support profiles, notes, and decisions are shared within the Team

The person receiving support has no access to their own care records

Team Owners can view and contribute to their notes and support plans

Family and friends are rarely recognised or included

Family and friends can be full Team members, with roles and responsibilities

Communication goes through the office

Team members communicate directly

The person receiving care is treated only as a recipient

They are an active contributor to the Team’s work and life


Why it matters

The Teams model doesn’t just improve outcomes; it transforms someone's entire experience of care.

When people know who’s turning up, feel listened to, and are treated as full human beings rather than cases or clients, care becomes something relational and life-giving. When those giving support are respected, trusted, and given autonomy, the quality of their work improves too.

This model restores what’s so often missing in traditional care: trust, connection, choice, and dignity.