LogoLogo
  • Introduction
    • πŸ₯³Welcome to the playbook
    • πŸ“’Project background
    • What is co-operative care?
    • πŸ› οΈHow to use the playbook
    • A word from...
      • Equal Care
      • Clapton Care Commons
  • Start and Grow
    • 🚠Overview
    • 🌍Foundation
      • Founders
      • Find the others
      • Feasibility
      • Formation
    • Have a go
    • Find (more) money
    • Share the power
    • πŸŽ‹Grow
      • Recruit workers
      • Start teams
    • Sustain
  • Technology
    • Equal Care's Platform
    • Equal Care's technology journey
    • Choosing technologies
      • Social Care Platform Vendors
  • Fundraising
    • Fundraising options
    • Community Share Offers
      • Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
    • Commons Contribution
    • Restrictions on investment
  • Equal Care's Model
    • Our Purpose
    • How we work
    • Sociocracy
    • Circles
      • Long term decisions
      • Everyday decisions
      • Circle records
      • Consent
      • Proposals
    • Teams
      • Why we use the Teams model
      • Who's in?
      • Team Starting
        • The role of a Team Starter
        • 1. Starting a Team: The First Contact
        • 2. Beginning the Relationship
        • 3. Finding the Right Match
        • 4. Supportive Conversation & Trust Assessment
          • 4a. Example of a Supportive Conversation
          • 4b. Example of a Trust Assessment
        • 5. Profiles and promises
          • 5a. The Getting Support Promise
          • 5b. The Getting Support Profile
          • 5c. Worker and team member profiles
        • 6. Building a team
          • 6a. Finding and welcoming new members
          • 6b. Trialling new team members
        • 7. Getting Organised: Roles and Hats
        • 8. Stepping Back: Team Independence
      • Dealing with conflict and change
        • Conflict support
        • How to leave a team well
    • Hats
      • Team Hats
      • Circle Hats - Process
      • Circle Hats - Operational
        • Care Commons Organiser
        • Peer supervisor
    • Platform
    • Co-production
      • Implementing co-production
      • Context of co-production in social care
      • Governance for co-production
      • Ownership for co-production
    • Care Commons
    • Radical Candour
  • Evaluation framework
    • Introduction
    • Commons-based Care: the Context
    • Scope
      • Three Domains of Care Outcomes: Process, Change, and Maintenance.
      • Three Domains of Outcomes in Equal Care
      • Mapping Equal Care Outputs to Outcomes Domains
      • Social Climate as a Key Evaluative Lens
    • Evaluation Challenges
    • Methods
      • Social Climate Survey
      • Community Mapping
      • Interviews and workshops
      • Group activities
      • Community needs assessment
        • Locality analysis
    • Data Analysis
      • Interviews Outcome Domains
        • Growth Outcomes
        • Well-being, Relationships & Belonging Outcomes
        • Systems Maintenaince & Co-production Outcomes
      • Community Network Map: Analysis & Overview
        • Who’s in the Network?
        • Bridging the Gap Between Formal and Informal Care
        • Mapping Care Wealth
        • What We Learned from the Teams
        • The Role of Teams in the Community Care Network
        • Reflections and Future Directions
      • Reflections from the Ground: Insights from Key Circle Leads
        • Circle Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Teams Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Platform Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Commons Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
          • Care Commons Organiser Role Description
    • The Toolbox
      • Theory of Change
        • What is a Theory of Change?
          • Using a Theory of Change
        • Co-producing our Theory of Change
        • Observations about ToC Outcomes
        • How to use our interactive ToC
          • Orientation to ToC Tool: The Kumu Platform
            • Using the focus function in Kumu
            • Using Basic Control Functions
            • Toggling Between views
          • 1. Outputs Dimensions and Outcome Domains
          • 2. Coop Output Dimensions - a deeper dive.
          • 3. Coop Outcomes Domains. A deeper dive.
        • Using ToC tool to understand our model of care: Key Outputs.
        • Using ToC tool to understand our model of care: Key Outcomes
        • Using ToC tool to see how we measure outcomes
        • Using ToC tool to understand the impact of specific features of the coop
          • Circle ToC
          • Platform ToC
          • Teams ToC
          • Commons ToC
        • Using this tool for Strategy and Planning
      • Equal Care Coop's Social Climate Survey
        • About Equal Care's Social Climate
          • Why Measure Social Climate?
        • Interpreting Growth Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Interpreting Systems Maintenance and Co-production Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Interpreting Well-being, Relationships & Belonging Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Using the Social Climate Survey: Resources and Challenges.
        • List of Survey Items for all Stake Holders
      • Community Care Mapping Tool
      • Interview Templates
      • Atlas Care Maps
      • Co-Production Capacity Assessment Tool
        • 10 capacities for co-production
        • Using the tool
  • Service Specification
    • Care as a common pool resource
    • Service Spec
    • Service Map
  • Cost Model
    • Introduction
    • Resources
    • Fair wages
    • Cost Models in Social Care
  • Resources
    • Co-op operations
      • Communications
        • Roles
        • Tone of Voice
        • Digital Inclusion
        • Social Media
      • Learning
        • What you need to know
        • Peer to peer learning
    • Documentation
    • Care and Support Rates
    • Co-op rules & bylaws
    • Care Mapping with Atlas of Care
      • Care Mapping for Relationship-Centred Care
      • Care Mapping for new Teams
      • Care Mapping for Evaluation
    • Glossary
Powered by GitBook

Β© Equal Care Co-op Ltd 2025

On this page
  • πŸ—³ Inclusive governance
  • 🀝 Shared accountability
  • πŸ“£ Participation with power
  • πŸ” Shared resources, shared sustainability
  • 🧡 Better communication, deeper collaboration
  • πŸ”„ Mutual benefit and reciprocity
  • 🎯 Services that reflect what matters

Was this helpful?

Export as PDF
  1. Equal Care's Model
  2. Co-production

Ownership for co-production

Why ownership matters

At Equal Care, we’ve chosen a multi-stakeholder co-operative model: one where the people who give and receive support, as well as family members, volunteers and workers, can all become members and co-owners.

This isn’t just a nice idea. It’s a structural commitment to co-production.

When ownership is shared, so is decision-making. And when people who receive support help to shape the organisation - not just through feedback, but through governance and participation - co-production becomes part of the foundation, not an add-on.

πŸ—³ Inclusive governance

Each member of a multi-stakeholder co-op has a voice and, crucially, a vote. That means people receiving care and support are not only listened to, but are part of the decisions that shape the organisation and the services it provides.

🀝 Shared accountability

With multiple groups holding ownership - including those receiving support - accountability is collective. This leads to a culture of mutual responsibility and a shared commitment to quality.

πŸ“£ Participation with power

Being a co-owner gives people real influence. It’s one thing to be consulted, it’s another to be a voting member with a say in how things are run! Ownership helps shift relationships from transactional to collaborative.

πŸ” Shared resources, shared sustainability

When ownership is distributed, so are contributions. Whether it’s time, knowledge, experience or funding, pooling resources from many stakeholders supports long-term sustainability and encourages innovation.

🧡 Better communication, deeper collaboration

Co-operative ownership strengthens communication between different groups: whether workers, people receiving support or others involved in care. Open structures and shared goals make it easier to collaborate and adjust services together.

πŸ”„ Mutual benefit and reciprocity

In a multi-stakeholder co-op, everyone contributes, and everyone gains. Whether it's through better support, meaningful involvement, or stronger relationships, the benefits of co-production are shared. This spirit of mutuality builds trust and reinforces the sense of working together, not just for someone, but with each other.

🎯 Services that reflect what matters

When people receiving support are also co-owners, services are more likely to reflect real preferences and needs. The feedback loop is built in. Services evolve because the people most affected by them are part of the decision-making process.


A multi-stakeholder co-op structure doesn’t guarantee co-production - but it creates the conditions for it to thrive. By giving everyone a seat at the table, it turns shared values into shared power.

PreviousGovernance for co-productionNextCare Commons

Last updated 1 month ago

Was this helpful?