LogoLogo
  • Introduction
    • 🥳Welcome to the playbook
    • 📒Project background
    • What is co-operative care?
    • 🛠️How to use the playbook
    • A word from...
      • Equal Care
      • Clapton Care Commons
  • Start and Grow
    • 🚠Overview
    • 🌍Foundation
      • Founders
      • Find the others
      • Feasibility
      • Formation
    • Have a go
    • Find (more) money
    • Share the power
    • 🎋Grow
      • Recruit workers
      • Start teams
    • Sustain
  • Technology
    • Equal Care's Platform
    • Equal Care's technology journey
    • Choosing technologies
      • Social Care Platform Vendors
  • Fundraising
    • Fundraising options
    • Community Share Offers
      • Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
    • Commons Contribution
    • Restrictions on investment
  • Equal Care's Model
    • Our Purpose
    • How we work
    • Sociocracy
    • Circles
      • Long term decisions
      • Everyday decisions
      • Circle records
      • Consent
      • Proposals
    • Teams
      • Why we use the Teams model
      • Who's in?
      • Team Starting
        • The role of a Team Starter
        • 1. Starting a Team: The First Contact
        • 2. Beginning the Relationship
        • 3. Finding the Right Match
        • 4. Supportive Conversation & Trust Assessment
          • 4a. Example of a Supportive Conversation
          • 4b. Example of a Trust Assessment
        • 5. Profiles and promises
          • 5a. The Getting Support Promise
          • 5b. The Getting Support Profile
          • 5c. Worker and team member profiles
        • 6. Building a team
          • 6a. Finding and welcoming new members
          • 6b. Trialling new team members
        • 7. Getting Organised: Roles and Hats
        • 8. Stepping Back: Team Independence
      • Dealing with conflict and change
        • Conflict support
        • How to leave a team well
    • Hats
      • Team Hats
      • Circle Hats - Process
      • Circle Hats - Operational
        • Care Commons Organiser
        • Peer supervisor
    • Platform
    • Co-production
      • Implementing co-production
      • Context of co-production in social care
      • Governance for co-production
      • Ownership for co-production
    • Care Commons
    • Radical Candour
  • Evaluation framework
    • Introduction
    • Commons-based Care: the Context
    • Scope
      • Three Domains of Care Outcomes: Process, Change, and Maintenance.
      • Three Domains of Outcomes in Equal Care
      • Mapping Equal Care Outputs to Outcomes Domains
      • Social Climate as a Key Evaluative Lens
    • Evaluation Challenges
    • Methods
      • Social Climate Survey
      • Community Mapping
      • Interviews and workshops
      • Group activities
      • Community needs assessment
        • Locality analysis
    • Data Analysis
      • Interviews Outcome Domains
        • Growth Outcomes
        • Well-being, Relationships & Belonging Outcomes
        • Systems Maintenaince & Co-production Outcomes
      • Community Network Map: Analysis & Overview
        • Who’s in the Network?
        • Bridging the Gap Between Formal and Informal Care
        • Mapping Care Wealth
        • What We Learned from the Teams
        • The Role of Teams in the Community Care Network
        • Reflections and Future Directions
      • Reflections from the Ground: Insights from Key Circle Leads
        • Circle Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Teams Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Platform Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Commons Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
          • Care Commons Organiser Role Description
    • The Toolbox
      • Theory of Change
        • What is a Theory of Change?
          • Using a Theory of Change
        • Co-producing our Theory of Change
        • Observations about ToC Outcomes
        • How to use our interactive ToC
          • Orientation to ToC Tool: The Kumu Platform
            • Using the focus function in Kumu
            • Using Basic Control Functions
            • Toggling Between views
          • 1. Outputs Dimensions and Outcome Domains
          • 2. Coop Output Dimensions - a deeper dive.
          • 3. Coop Outcomes Domains. A deeper dive.
        • Using ToC tool to understand our model of care: Key Outputs.
        • Using ToC tool to understand our model of care: Key Outcomes
        • Using ToC tool to see how we measure outcomes
        • Using ToC tool to understand the impact of specific features of the coop
          • Circle ToC
          • Platform ToC
          • Teams ToC
          • Commons ToC
        • Using this tool for Strategy and Planning
      • Equal Care Coop's Social Climate Survey
        • About Equal Care's Social Climate
          • Why Measure Social Climate?
        • Interpreting Growth Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Interpreting Systems Maintenance and Co-production Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Interpreting Well-being, Relationships & Belonging Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Using the Social Climate Survey: Resources and Challenges.
        • List of Survey Items for all Stake Holders
      • Community Care Mapping Tool
      • Interview Templates
      • Atlas Care Maps
      • Co-Production Capacity Assessment Tool
        • 10 capacities for co-production
        • Using the tool
  • Service Specification
    • Care as a common pool resource
    • Service Spec
    • Service Map
  • Cost Model
    • Introduction
    • Resources
    • Fair wages
    • Cost Models in Social Care
  • Resources
    • Co-op operations
      • Communications
        • Roles
        • Tone of Voice
        • Digital Inclusion
        • Social Media
      • Learning
        • What you need to know
        • Peer to peer learning
    • Documentation
    • Care and Support Rates
    • Co-op rules & bylaws
    • Care Mapping with Atlas of Care
      • Care Mapping for Relationship-Centred Care
      • Care Mapping for new Teams
      • Care Mapping for Evaluation
    • Glossary
Powered by GitBook

© Equal Care Co-op Ltd 2025

On this page

Was this helpful?

Export as PDF
  1. Evaluation framework
  2. Data Analysis
  3. Interviews Outcome Domains

Growth Outcomes

Individual Development / Individual Change Agency / Independence & Autonomy / Inclusion & Participation / Learning & Skills Development

Many interviewees emphasized the way in which Equal Care places value on individual agency and growth. This came through most strongly when explicit comparisons were made between traditional care agencies in the private sector:

Social services is a bit like getting a parcel from amazon. Its a totally passive thing, no relationship. Equal care does things differently. It tries to look at the person and try to ask questions about what they actually want and need. Everyone has different care needs.

The Amazon metaphor that this Care Owner uses to describe her previous experience of care service is revealing on two levels. Firstly it conveys the 'impersonal' or anonymised nature of the interaction, where instead of a relationship there is just a consumer transaction, the handing over of a product. The reference to a corporate platform is also significant in relation to the increased automization of care services as digital tools are deployed to monitor and control every move of care workers, reducing their role to a series of quantifiable tasks.

The importance of recognising that different people have different care needs came across strongly in many of the interviews. One of the care owners spoke about the importance of making sure that there is a good match between the care worker and care receiver in terms of specific skills and experience that might be important e.g. being able to provide support using digital technologies. She also emphasized the importance of compatibility in terms of interests, personality, energy and other characteristics: "you don't put a highly organized neat freak with a scatty person." To illustrate the lack of agency or flexibility that existing within normal care services, one of the Care Owners shared an anecdote from a conversation with a friend who was using an NHS trust:

I once asked her what she would like to be different in her life if she had the power to change it. She said that she would like to not have sugar in her tea. Can you imagine feeling so totally disempowered that you don't even feel able to say how you like your tea?

Despite the emphasis placed on agency and compatibility when it comes to making the match between care worker and care receiver, interviewees reflected that in practice "in terms of freedom and choice, there were very few choices" due to the scale of the project. Freedom of choice for this kind of project is contingent on having a sufficient number of teams, number of working hours and different options to swap between teams. A couple of the interviewees felt that it was therefore misleading or hypocritical for freedom of choice to be one of the "selling points" of Equal Care. One of the original circle members expressed regret and frustration that they didn't start recruitment from Day 0. This was because they needed support from the central office in Calderdale who didn't have capacity until several months into the project. This 'chicken-and-egg' problem regarding the scale of the project is explored in more detail in the Systems and Co-production Outcome Domain.

Another fundamental challenge that came through in the interviews was that many of the Care Owners were struggling with not having their basic needs met, for example in terms of food or their housing situation, and the Care Circle was powerless to meaningfully improve this situation. As one Care Circle member describes:

I am very aware that food provision is still a huge issue in people's lives. I often have phone calls with one of the Care Owners who says that she has no food in the fridge. It's that feeling of 'wow we still haven't managed to achieve systems change. Yes their life is better but still there is no food in the fridge. We need something like a food cooperative to meet these needs but I can't set one up myself. I live in a reality where I know what needs to happen but it won't happen.

In relation to personal development, interviewees reflected is hard to even start to think about building things like confidence and connectedness when the most basic needs are still not even being met.

Individual growth was also a theme in relation to the care workers, both in terms of professional skills-development and transformative experiences on a more emotional level. Interviews with the workers illustrate how Equal Care's circles and other organisational spaces have created what we might call a 'capacitating atmosphere' which has had a positive impact on all the factors within this Domain. One worker, for example, desribes the atmosphere of the groups she has participated in through Equal Care:

[the meetings] all have this... like energy about them, where it's a comfortable space even though it's digital. I know a lot of the time when you think of space it's like a physical room. But they all had this energy about them.

She explains how this atmosphere made it possible for her to take on new challenges:

I think sometimes having an overwhelming sense of authority kind of makes like...people shy away from saying certain things.. a complaint or something that you might want to say. Here it feels like I'm talking to someone who is going to help me solve a potential problem [...] I never felt there is stress or pressure for me to like do anything I didn't want to do. I think not being forced into anything, has made me more open to naturally finding out that I am open to doing things.

The idea of being able to choose between options is once again significant here, with workers feeling like they can take a step when they are ready rather than because they are required or expected to. This theme was echoed in comments by other care workers, particularly in relation to having a voice: "I'm quite outspoken... but a lot of people actually take offense by that. In Equal Care they've encouraged that and they say we want you to speak out."

The benefits of this culture go beyond personal development in a professional context. One worker describes "the positive influence that its had", not just on her work like but on "outside my work commitments, my own mental health, my own wellbeing, [its] been priceless for me."

Across the interviews, there were numerous examples of different ways the Clapton Circle team had found to acknowledge and to value the paid and unpaid forms of care labour that people carry out. For example, the community organiser described how she made a promise to herself that she would always celebrate people's birthdays and make them a cake.

Unfortunately, Survey and Platform Data were not gathered and available in time to inform this analysis of domain of Outcomes.

PreviousInterviews Outcome DomainsNextWell-being, Relationships & Belonging Outcomes

Last updated 8 months ago

Was this helpful?