LogoLogo
  • Introduction
    • 🥳Welcome to the playbook
    • đź“’Project background
    • What is co-operative care?
    • 🛠️How to use the playbook
    • A word from...
      • Equal Care
      • Clapton Care Commons
  • Start and Grow
    • đźš Overview
    • 🌍Foundation
      • Founders
      • Find the others
      • Feasibility
      • Formation
    • Have a go
    • Find (more) money
    • Share the power
    • 🎋Grow
      • Recruit workers
      • Start teams
    • Sustain
  • Technology
    • Equal Care's Platform
    • Equal Care's technology journey
    • Choosing technologies
      • Social Care Platform Vendors
  • Fundraising
    • Fundraising options
    • Community Share Offers
      • Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
    • Commons Contribution
    • Restrictions on investment
  • Equal Care's Model
    • Our Purpose
    • How we work
    • Sociocracy
    • Circles
      • Long term decisions
      • Everyday decisions
      • Circle records
      • Consent
      • Proposals
    • Teams
      • Why we use the Teams model
      • Who's in?
      • Team Starting
        • The role of a Team Starter
        • 1. Starting a Team: The First Contact
        • 2. Beginning the Relationship
        • 3. Finding the Right Match
        • 4. Supportive Conversation & Trust Assessment
          • 4a. Example of a Supportive Conversation
          • 4b. Example of a Trust Assessment
        • 5. Profiles and promises
          • 5a. The Getting Support Promise
          • 5b. The Getting Support Profile
          • 5c. Worker and team member profiles
        • 6. Building a team
          • 6a. Finding and welcoming new members
          • 6b. Trialling new team members
        • 7. Getting Organised: Roles and Hats
        • 8. Stepping Back: Team Independence
      • Dealing with conflict and change
        • Conflict support
        • How to leave a team well
    • Hats
      • Team Hats
      • Circle Hats - Process
      • Circle Hats - Operational
        • Care Commons Organiser
        • Peer supervisor
    • Platform
    • Co-production
      • Implementing co-production
      • Context of co-production in social care
      • Governance for co-production
      • Ownership for co-production
    • Care Commons
    • Radical Candour
  • Evaluation framework
    • Introduction
    • Commons-based Care: the Context
    • Scope
      • Three Domains of Care Outcomes: Process, Change, and Maintenance.
      • Three Domains of Outcomes in Equal Care
      • Mapping Equal Care Outputs to Outcomes Domains
      • Social Climate as a Key Evaluative Lens
    • Evaluation Challenges
    • Methods
      • Social Climate Survey
      • Community Mapping
      • Interviews and workshops
      • Group activities
      • Community needs assessment
        • Locality analysis
    • Data Analysis
      • Interviews Outcome Domains
        • Growth Outcomes
        • Well-being, Relationships & Belonging Outcomes
        • Systems Maintenaince & Co-production Outcomes
      • Community Network Map: Analysis & Overview
        • Who’s in the Network?
        • Bridging the Gap Between Formal and Informal Care
        • Mapping Care Wealth
        • What We Learned from the Teams
        • The Role of Teams in the Community Care Network
        • Reflections and Future Directions
      • Reflections from the Ground: Insights from Key Circle Leads
        • Circle Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Teams Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Platform Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Commons Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
          • Care Commons Organiser Role Description
    • The Toolbox
      • Theory of Change
        • What is a Theory of Change?
          • Using a Theory of Change
        • Co-producing our Theory of Change
        • Observations about ToC Outcomes
        • How to use our interactive ToC
          • Orientation to ToC Tool: The Kumu Platform
            • Using the focus function in Kumu
            • Using Basic Control Functions
            • Toggling Between views
          • 1. Outputs Dimensions and Outcome Domains
          • 2. Coop Output Dimensions - a deeper dive.
          • 3. Coop Outcomes Domains. A deeper dive.
        • Using ToC tool to understand our model of care: Key Outputs.
        • Using ToC tool to understand our model of care: Key Outcomes
        • Using ToC tool to see how we measure outcomes
        • Using ToC tool to understand the impact of specific features of the coop
          • Circle ToC
          • Platform ToC
          • Teams ToC
          • Commons ToC
        • Using this tool for Strategy and Planning
      • Equal Care Coop's Social Climate Survey
        • About Equal Care's Social Climate
          • Why Measure Social Climate?
        • Interpreting Growth Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Interpreting Systems Maintenance and Co-production Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Interpreting Well-being, Relationships & Belonging Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Using the Social Climate Survey: Resources and Challenges.
        • List of Survey Items for all Stake Holders
      • Community Care Mapping Tool
      • Interview Templates
      • Atlas Care Maps
      • Co-Production Capacity Assessment Tool
        • 10 capacities for co-production
        • Using the tool
  • Service Specification
    • Care as a common pool resource
    • Service Spec
    • Service Map
  • Cost Model
    • Introduction
    • Resources
    • Fair wages
    • Cost Models in Social Care
  • Resources
    • Co-op operations
      • Communications
        • Roles
        • Tone of Voice
        • Digital Inclusion
        • Social Media
      • Learning
        • What you need to know
        • Peer to peer learning
    • Documentation
    • Care and Support Rates
    • Co-op rules & bylaws
    • Care Mapping with Atlas of Care
      • Care Mapping for Relationship-Centred Care
      • Care Mapping for new Teams
      • Care Mapping for Evaluation
    • Glossary
Powered by GitBook

© Equal Care Co-op Ltd 2025

On this page

Was this helpful?

Export as PDF
  1. Resources
  2. Care Mapping with Atlas of Care

Care Mapping for Evaluation

Reviewing and Redrawing Care Maps

In Equal Care Coop’s relationship-centred approach, care mapping not only serves as a tool for care planning and team building but also plays a crucial role in evaluating and monitoring the effectiveness of our services. Regularly reviewing and redrawing a care receiver’s care map enables care teams to assess the impact of the support being provided, ensuring that it remains aligned with the individual’s relationships, well-being, and evolving needs.

Monitoring Relationship-Centred Care

By revisiting the care map over time, staff can gain valuable insights into how the care receiver’s relationships and support networks have changed. These reviews provide an opportunity to evaluate the extent to which our services are fostering meaningful relationships, promoting the individual’s sense of belonging, and supporting their active engagement within their community. This relationship-centred focus ensures that the care we provide continues to prioritize the individual’s role within their support network, rather than just focusing on task-oriented outcomes. Key indicators of successful relationship-centred care that can be monitored through care map reviews include:

Strengthening of Key Relationships: Has the individual’s connection to important people and places grown stronger since the initial mapping? Are there new, meaningful relationships that have emerged through the care process?

Integration of Informal Support: Are family members, friends, neighbours, and community resources actively engaged in the individual’s care? Has professional care complemented rather than replaced these informal support networks?

Care Flow and Distribution: Are caregiving responsibilities more evenly distributed within the individual’s network, or have any imbalances been identified and addressed? Is there less strain on specific individuals or groups, thanks to better collaboration?

Adjusting the Care Plan

As care maps are redrawn and updated, they act as living documents that reflect the dynamic nature of care relationships. This allows staff to make necessary adjustments to the care plan based on real-time information. If certain relationships have weakened or if new sources of support have emerged, the care plan can be adapted to reflect these changes. This flexibility ensures that care is always tailored to the individual’s current circumstances and remains in alignment with their emotional, social, and physical needs.

Evaluating Service Performance

For Equal Care Co-op, reviewing care maps is also a critical tool for evaluating overall service performance. Relationship-centered care is not just about providing support but about ensuring that care enhances an individual’s well-being within their community. Care map reviews offer a concrete way to measure this by:

Tracking Outcomes Over Time: The evolution of a care map over time provides a visual representation of how our services are impacting an individual’s relationships and well-being. Growth in the number and quality of relationships, as well as a more equitable distribution of care responsibilities, are indicators of successful service delivery.

Identifying Gaps and Challenges: Regular care map reviews can highlight gaps in the care network or reveal relationships that need additional support. This helps the team proactively address these areas, ensuring that no critical relationships or care needs are overlooked.

Ensuring Continuity and Coordination: A care map that is regularly updated ensures that all members of the care team—including professional caregivers, family members, and community supporters—are aligned and working toward the same goals. This coordination improves the quality of care and reduces the likelihood of miscommunication or gaps in service delivery.

PreviousCare Mapping for new TeamsNextGlossary

Last updated 10 days ago

Was this helpful?