LogoLogo
  • Introduction
    • 🥳Welcome to the playbook
    • 📒Project background
    • What is co-operative care?
    • 🛠️How to use the playbook
    • A word from...
      • Equal Care
      • Clapton Care Commons
  • Start and Grow
    • 🚠Overview
    • 🌍Foundation
      • Founders
      • Find the others
      • Feasibility
      • Formation
    • Have a go
    • Find (more) money
    • Share the power
    • 🎋Grow
      • Recruit workers
      • Start teams
    • Sustain
  • Technology
    • Equal Care's Platform
    • Equal Care's technology journey
    • Choosing technologies
      • Social Care Platform Vendors
  • Fundraising
    • Fundraising options
    • Community Share Offers
      • Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
    • Commons Contribution
    • Restrictions on investment
  • Equal Care's Model
    • Our Purpose
    • How we work
    • Sociocracy
    • Circles
      • Long term decisions
      • Everyday decisions
      • Circle records
      • Consent
      • Proposals
    • Teams
      • Why we use the Teams model
      • Who's in?
      • Team Starting
        • The role of a Team Starter
        • 1. Starting a Team: The First Contact
        • 2. Beginning the Relationship
        • 3. Finding the Right Match
        • 4. Supportive Conversation & Trust Assessment
          • 4a. Example of a Supportive Conversation
          • 4b. Example of a Trust Assessment
        • 5. Profiles and promises
          • 5a. The Getting Support Promise
          • 5b. The Getting Support Profile
          • 5c. Worker and team member profiles
        • 6. Building a team
          • 6a. Finding and welcoming new members
          • 6b. Trialling new team members
        • 7. Getting Organised: Roles and Hats
        • 8. Stepping Back: Team Independence
      • Dealing with conflict and change
        • Conflict support
        • How to leave a team well
    • Hats
      • Team Hats
      • Circle Hats - Process
      • Circle Hats - Operational
        • Care Commons Organiser
        • Peer supervisor
    • Platform
    • Co-production
      • Implementing co-production
      • Context of co-production in social care
      • Governance for co-production
      • Ownership for co-production
    • Care Commons
    • Radical Candour
  • Evaluation framework
    • Introduction
    • Commons-based Care: the Context
    • Scope
      • Three Domains of Care Outcomes: Process, Change, and Maintenance.
      • Three Domains of Outcomes in Equal Care
      • Mapping Equal Care Outputs to Outcomes Domains
      • Social Climate as a Key Evaluative Lens
    • Evaluation Challenges
    • Methods
      • Social Climate Survey
      • Community Mapping
      • Interviews and workshops
      • Group activities
      • Community needs assessment
        • Locality analysis
    • Data Analysis
      • Interviews Outcome Domains
        • Growth Outcomes
        • Well-being, Relationships & Belonging Outcomes
        • Systems Maintenaince & Co-production Outcomes
      • Community Network Map: Analysis & Overview
        • Who’s in the Network?
        • Bridging the Gap Between Formal and Informal Care
        • Mapping Care Wealth
        • What We Learned from the Teams
        • The Role of Teams in the Community Care Network
        • Reflections and Future Directions
      • Reflections from the Ground: Insights from Key Circle Leads
        • Circle Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Teams Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Platform Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Commons Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
          • Care Commons Organiser Role Description
    • The Toolbox
      • Theory of Change
        • What is a Theory of Change?
          • Using a Theory of Change
        • Co-producing our Theory of Change
        • Observations about ToC Outcomes
        • How to use our interactive ToC
          • Orientation to ToC Tool: The Kumu Platform
            • Using the focus function in Kumu
            • Using Basic Control Functions
            • Toggling Between views
          • 1. Outputs Dimensions and Outcome Domains
          • 2. Coop Output Dimensions - a deeper dive.
          • 3. Coop Outcomes Domains. A deeper dive.
        • Using ToC tool to understand our model of care: Key Outputs.
        • Using ToC tool to understand our model of care: Key Outcomes
        • Using ToC tool to see how we measure outcomes
        • Using ToC tool to understand the impact of specific features of the coop
          • Circle ToC
          • Platform ToC
          • Teams ToC
          • Commons ToC
        • Using this tool for Strategy and Planning
      • Equal Care Coop's Social Climate Survey
        • About Equal Care's Social Climate
          • Why Measure Social Climate?
        • Interpreting Growth Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Interpreting Systems Maintenance and Co-production Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Interpreting Well-being, Relationships & Belonging Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Using the Social Climate Survey: Resources and Challenges.
        • List of Survey Items for all Stake Holders
      • Community Care Mapping Tool
      • Interview Templates
      • Atlas Care Maps
      • Co-Production Capacity Assessment Tool
        • 10 capacities for co-production
        • Using the tool
  • Service Specification
    • Care as a common pool resource
    • Service Spec
    • Service Map
  • Cost Model
    • Introduction
    • Resources
    • Fair wages
    • Cost Models in Social Care
  • Resources
    • Co-op operations
      • Communications
        • Roles
        • Tone of Voice
        • Digital Inclusion
        • Social Media
      • Learning
        • What you need to know
        • Peer to peer learning
    • Documentation
    • Care and Support Rates
    • Co-op rules & bylaws
    • Care Mapping with Atlas of Care
      • Care Mapping for Relationship-Centred Care
      • Care Mapping for new Teams
      • Care Mapping for Evaluation
    • Glossary
Powered by GitBook

© Equal Care Co-op Ltd 2025

On this page
  • What is 'Care Wealth'?
  • Types of Care Identified
  • Who’s Providing This Care?
  • Generative vs Inactive Connections
  • What Does This Tell Us?

Was this helpful?

Export as PDF
  1. Evaluation framework
  2. Data Analysis
  3. Community Network Map: Analysis & Overview

Mapping Care Wealth

PreviousBridging the Gap Between Formal and Informal CareNextWhat We Learned from the Teams

Last updated 27 days ago

Was this helpful?

The Clapton Care Circle map reveals an abundance of informal, gifted, and community-based care within the local network. This “care wealth” includes a wide range of support activities that are often undervalued or invisible within traditional models of health and social care.

What is 'Care Wealth'?

Care wealth refers to the rich ecosystem of unpaid or gifted care that helps people live well - everything from emotional support and community meals to skill-sharing, gardening, and transporting neighbours. This wealth flows through the relationships that individuals, groups, and organisations have with one another. By mapping these connections, we aim to make visible the generosity, trust, and relational power that sustains community life.

Care is fundamentally a relationship. “Care wealth” exists not just in services, but in the connections between people.


Types of Care Identified

Across the Clapton network, 20 different types of informal or gifted care were identified. These range from emotional and social support to practical help and community enrichment. Some of the most frequently mentioned types of care include:

  • Wellness, Emotional & Mental Health Support – mentioned 30 times

  • Social Connection & Engagement – 24 times

  • Recreational & Leisure Activities – 10 times

  • Education, Training & Skills Development – 10 times

  • Advocacy – 5 times

These types of support often require fewer resources than formal care, as they are rooted in relational quality rather than professional infrastructure.

A fuller breakdown of care types, their definitions, and examples is available here.


Who’s Providing This Care?

Of the 42 elements listed in the map (people, groups, or organisations), 76.2% (32 elements) were actively offering informal or gifted care and support to either the Clapton Circle as a whole, or one of its five participating teams. Only 10 mapped elements had no direct caregiving role in the project.

The most common care types offered across the network include:

  • Wellness, Emotional & Mental Health Support – 27 mentions

  • Social Connection & Engagement – 26 mentions

  • Recreational & Leisure Activities – 15 mentions

  • Advocacy – 14 mentions

  • Coordination and Logistics – 12 mentions

This variety highlights the community’s capacity to meet a wide range of quality of life needs - especially those often left out of task-based social care models.


Generative vs Inactive Connections

In mapping this ecosystem, we assessed not just who was connected to whom, but how active those connections were. Every link between elements was classified into one of three categories:

Type of Connection
Description
Share of Total

Generative

Active and facilitating the flow of care and support

42.2%

Engaged

A known relationship exists, but not currently generating support

26.5%

Inactive

A prior or potential connection with no current interaction

31.3%

While nearly half of the relationships were generative at the time of evaluation, the remaining connections represent untapped or underutilised care wealth. In total, only around 37% of all mapped connections were both sustained and generative.


What Does This Tell Us?

This analysis highlights both the depth of caregiving capacity in Clapton and the challenges in sustaining it. The Circle's aim to create a more integrated, responsive, and community-rooted model of care clearly tapped into a wide base of support, but maintaining that support over time proved difficult.

To strengthen care flows in future, a more focused strategy may be needed, prioritising deeper engagement with a smaller number of trusted partners, and building long-term collaborations that are easier to maintain and more impactful overall.

To view the map in a different window click here