LogoLogo
  • Introduction
    • 🥳Welcome to the playbook
    • 📒Project background
    • What is co-operative care?
    • 🛠️How to use the playbook
    • A word from...
      • Equal Care
      • Clapton Care Commons
  • Start and Grow
    • 🚠Overview
    • 🌍Foundation
      • Founders
      • Find the others
      • Feasibility
      • Formation
    • Have a go
    • Find (more) money
    • Share the power
    • 🎋Grow
      • Recruit workers
      • Start teams
    • Sustain
  • Technology
    • Equal Care's Platform
    • Equal Care's technology journey
    • Choosing technologies
      • Social Care Platform Vendors
  • Fundraising
    • Fundraising options
    • Community Share Offers
      • Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
    • Commons Contribution
    • Restrictions on investment
  • Equal Care's Model
    • Our Purpose
    • How we work
    • Sociocracy
    • Circles
      • Long term decisions
      • Everyday decisions
      • Circle records
      • Consent
      • Proposals
    • Teams
      • Why we use the Teams model
      • Who's in?
      • Team Starting
        • The role of a Team Starter
        • 1. Starting a Team: The First Contact
        • 2. Beginning the Relationship
        • 3. Finding the Right Match
        • 4. Supportive Conversation & Trust Assessment
          • 4a. Example of a Supportive Conversation
          • 4b. Example of a Trust Assessment
        • 5. Profiles and promises
          • 5a. The Getting Support Promise
          • 5b. The Getting Support Profile
          • 5c. Worker and team member profiles
        • 6. Building a team
          • 6a. Finding and welcoming new members
          • 6b. Trialling new team members
        • 7. Getting Organised: Roles and Hats
        • 8. Stepping Back: Team Independence
      • Dealing with conflict and change
        • Conflict support
        • How to leave a team well
    • Hats
      • Team Hats
      • Circle Hats - Process
      • Circle Hats - Operational
        • Care Commons Organiser
        • Peer supervisor
    • Platform
    • Co-production
      • Implementing co-production
      • Context of co-production in social care
      • Governance for co-production
      • Ownership for co-production
    • Care Commons
    • Radical Candour
  • Evaluation framework
    • Introduction
    • Commons-based Care: the Context
    • Scope
      • Three Domains of Care Outcomes: Process, Change, and Maintenance.
      • Three Domains of Outcomes in Equal Care
      • Mapping Equal Care Outputs to Outcomes Domains
      • Social Climate as a Key Evaluative Lens
    • Evaluation Challenges
    • Methods
      • Social Climate Survey
      • Community Mapping
      • Interviews and workshops
      • Group activities
      • Community needs assessment
        • Locality analysis
    • Data Analysis
      • Interviews Outcome Domains
        • Growth Outcomes
        • Well-being, Relationships & Belonging Outcomes
        • Systems Maintenaince & Co-production Outcomes
      • Community Network Map: Analysis & Overview
        • Who’s in the Network?
        • Bridging the Gap Between Formal and Informal Care
        • Mapping Care Wealth
        • What We Learned from the Teams
        • The Role of Teams in the Community Care Network
        • Reflections and Future Directions
      • Reflections from the Ground: Insights from Key Circle Leads
        • Circle Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Teams Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Platform Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Commons Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
          • Care Commons Organiser Role Description
    • The Toolbox
      • Theory of Change
        • What is a Theory of Change?
          • Using a Theory of Change
        • Co-producing our Theory of Change
        • Observations about ToC Outcomes
        • How to use our interactive ToC
          • Orientation to ToC Tool: The Kumu Platform
            • Using the focus function in Kumu
            • Using Basic Control Functions
            • Toggling Between views
          • 1. Outputs Dimensions and Outcome Domains
          • 2. Coop Output Dimensions - a deeper dive.
          • 3. Coop Outcomes Domains. A deeper dive.
        • Using ToC tool to understand our model of care: Key Outputs.
        • Using ToC tool to understand our model of care: Key Outcomes
        • Using ToC tool to see how we measure outcomes
        • Using ToC tool to understand the impact of specific features of the coop
          • Circle ToC
          • Platform ToC
          • Teams ToC
          • Commons ToC
        • Using this tool for Strategy and Planning
      • Equal Care Coop's Social Climate Survey
        • About Equal Care's Social Climate
          • Why Measure Social Climate?
        • Interpreting Growth Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Interpreting Systems Maintenance and Co-production Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Interpreting Well-being, Relationships & Belonging Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Using the Social Climate Survey: Resources and Challenges.
        • List of Survey Items for all Stake Holders
      • Community Care Mapping Tool
      • Interview Templates
      • Atlas Care Maps
      • Co-Production Capacity Assessment Tool
        • 10 capacities for co-production
        • Using the tool
  • Service Specification
    • Care as a common pool resource
    • Service Spec
    • Service Map
  • Cost Model
    • Introduction
    • Resources
    • Fair wages
    • Cost Models in Social Care
  • Resources
    • Co-op operations
      • Communications
        • Roles
        • Tone of Voice
        • Digital Inclusion
        • Social Media
      • Learning
        • What you need to know
        • Peer to peer learning
    • Documentation
    • Care and Support Rates
    • Co-op rules & bylaws
    • Care Mapping with Atlas of Care
      • Care Mapping for Relationship-Centred Care
      • Care Mapping for new Teams
      • Care Mapping for Evaluation
    • Glossary
Powered by GitBook

© Equal Care Co-op Ltd 2025

On this page
  • Why it matters for cooperative care
  • Our sources

Was this helpful?

Export as PDF
  1. Evaluation framework
  2. Methods

Community needs assessment

A community needs assessment is a foundational tool in planning hyper-local, cooperative models of care. By examining demographic, socio-economic, and cultural data for a specific area, it helps us understand the lived realities of the people who make up a place, together with their challenges, assets, and unmet needs.

This data-informed approach allows us to:

  • Align services with real-world demand

  • Design initiatives that are inclusive, equitable, and responsive

  • Measure impact in the context of the communities we work in

For Equal Care Co-op’s pilot in Clapton, East London, we focused primarily on Springfield Ward, situated in the London Borough of Hackney. Below is an overview of both areas.


Why it matters for cooperative care

This kind of analysis supports:

  • Strategic service design: tailoring care to local demographics

  • Impact evaluation: measuring change relative to real-world needs

  • Community resilience: identifying social infrastructure and pressure points

  • Equity: highlighting structural inequalities that care services can address

It also helps us understand the systems surrounding formal care, including the informal, familial, and voluntary relationships that form the foundation of the care commons.

For the most part our pilot project in the Springfield Ward of Hackney, London. Find a comprehensive Demographic Overview of Springfield Ward and Hackney in the tabs below.

Key Data Insights: Springfield Ward, based on the latest available data.

Springfield is a diverse, densely populated ward in Hackney with pronounced community networks and unique care needs.

Population & Age

  • Total population: 15,319 (2021 Census)

  • Children and young people (0–17): 34.9%

  • Adults (18–64): 56.4%

  • Older adults (65+): 8.7% The area is significantly younger than London’s average.

Ethnicity & Migration

  • White: 58.3%

  • Black: 16.7%

  • Asian: 7.2%

  • Other / mixed ethnic groups: 17.8%

  • Born outside the UK: 34% – including EU (9.6%) and Middle East/Asia (7.9%)

Housing & Deprivation

  • Social housing: ~40% of households

  • High levels of deprivation across employment, education, health, and crime domains

  • Many households experience complex challenges that affect care access

Employment & Occupation

  • Higher levels of part-time employment

  • Fewer residents in managerial/professional roles

  • Employment concentrated in administrative, caring, and service sectors

Education

  • Double the Hackney average for residents with no formal qualifications

  • Lower-than-average rates of higher education attainment

Religion & Cultural Identity

  • Orthodox Jewish population: 35.7% of the ward (5,461 people)

  • Other major religious groups: Christian (22.9%), Muslim (10.5%)

Orthodox Jewish Community Trends

  • One of Europe’s largest Charedi communities (~30,000 in Hackney)

  • Fast-growing, with high birth rates (25+ per 1,000)

  • Strong cultural identity with unique educational, housing, and healthcare needs

Health & Disability

  • Higher levels of long-term illness or disability than London average

  • Lower life expectancy than neighbouring areas

Transport

  • Low car ownership

  • High reliance on public transport, walking, and cycling

Hackney Borough: Contextual Overview, based on the latest available data.

Hackney overall shares some of Springfield’s characteristics, but with broader diversity and wider income ranges.

Demographics

  • Population: ~259,000

  • Young borough: median age of 32

  • Age breakdown:

    • 0–17: 21.8%

    • 18–64: 69.2%

    • 65+: 9.0%

Ethnicity & Migration

  • White: 36.4%

  • Black: 23.1%

  • Asian: 13.3%

  • Mixed/Other: 27.2%

  • Born outside the UK: 36%

Housing & Deprivation

  • Social housing: ~40%

  • High levels of deprivation across all domains, among the worst in England

Employment & Education

  • High levels of service-sector employment

  • Education levels mixed:

    • 23.1% have no formal qualifications

    • 55.2% hold Level 4+ qualifications

Health & Disability

  • Poorer health outcomes

  • More residents with long-term conditions

  • Lower life expectancy than many London boroughs

Crime

  • Higher rates of property-related crime and anti-social behaviour

Our sources

We drew on a mix of sources to build this localised demographic and socio-economic profile:

ONS Census 2021, Hackney Council Reports, City Population Data

How life has changed in Hackney: Census 2021 Hackney population change, Census 2021 – ONS

Springfield (Ward, United Kingdom) - Population Statistics, Charts, Map and Location

Ward data, England and Wales: Census 2021 - Office for National Statistics.

Jewish Chronicle

Revelations from the new book of Numbers: how the Census reflects the changing landscape of UK Jewry - The Jewish Chronicle

Local Government Association

London Borough of Hackney: Charedi Orthodox Jewish community engagement

This assessment forms the backdrop for understanding the needs of Springfield’s residents and evaluating how well our care model is responding to them.

Community needs assessment of the locality

The demographic profile of Springfield Ward in Hackney has several important implications for the cooperative care service's outputs, particularly in terms of how care is delivered, who provides it, and how local resources are mobilized.

Circle Outputs

Given that many residents in Springfield experience both economic deprivation and long-term health challenges, it is essential for multi-stakeholder service evaluations to account for how effectively these socio-economic and health needs are being met. The diverse ethnic and religious landscape—most notably, the significant Orthodox Jewish community—means that evaluations should assess how culturally and religiously inclusive the care services are. It is important to capture feedback from across the community to fully understand how well the care provided addresses the specific needs of different groups.

Recruitment for care roles can benefit from the local population’s characteristics. Many residents hold part-time service-oriented jobs and may have lower formal qualifications, making local recruitment a promising avenue. By focusing on individuals already familiar with caregiving or service roles, especially from marginalized communities, care circles can build trust and better reflect the local demographic. This approach will be particularly effective in engaging younger adults and parents who are active within their families or communities.

Economic deprivation also presents an opportunity to mobilize volunteers who seek to give back to their community while gaining valuable experience. Residents familiar with service-oriented roles are prime candidates for volunteering, and partnerships with local faith groups and community hubs can help connect volunteers with care circles. This is especially relevant for the Orthodox Jewish community, which has strong traditions of mutual support. Additionally, the religious and community networks that exist within Springfield can be key assets, providing resources that can enrich the quality of life for both care workers and those receiving care. Ensuring that circles engage with these networks can help meet cultural needs while deepening local support for care initiatives.

Teams Outputs

The high proportion of residents with long-term illnesses and disabilities necessitates close cooperation with healthcare professionals. Collaborative care plans and continuous communication will be key to ensuring that care workers have the tools and knowledge needed to manage complex health conditions. Engaging local health services will also enhance the quality of care by providing a more integrated approach to addressing both physical and mental health challenges.

Springfield's high number of family-oriented households, particularly within the Orthodox Jewish community, means that many people prefer informal care from known individuals. Encouraging families to build their own care teams, comprised of friends, relatives, and volunteers, will increase trust and ensure that care reflects the community’s values and preferences. This family involvement can also improve satisfaction with care services, as people are more likely to feel comfortable receiving care from those within their personal network.

Furthermore, the high rate of part-time employment in Springfield highlights the importance of flexible working arrangements for care workers. Many care workers likely balance other responsibilities, such as family caregiving, which makes flexible scheduling a crucial factor in attracting and retaining staff. Offering this flexibility will also allow more residents to take on care roles without sacrificing other commitments, creating a more stable workforce.

Commons Outputs

The significant level of economic deprivation in Springfield creates a clear need for local engagement, and the commons can play a key role in this. Mobilizing volunteers from within Springfield’s socially rented housing and community hubs will not only provide much-needed support for care services but will also offer meaningful engagement opportunities for residents. Partnering with faith groups and community organizations can help create a steady stream of volunteers, ensuring that care circles and teams have the resources they need.

Springfield’s strong tradition of community solidarity, particularly within its ethnic and religious groups, presents an opportunity to build on the gifting of time and resources. Skill-sharing and time-banking schemes can foster mutual support within the community, while partnerships with local religious institutions and community groups can encourage the gifting of time and care. These initiatives can strengthen mutual care practices and foster a sense of community ownership over care services.

The rich cultural and community networks in Springfield, especially within the Orthodox Jewish population, offer untapped resources that can enhance the quality of life for both care providers and recipients. By leveraging these networks, circles can access spaces, support, and cultural knowledge that will improve the experience of care for all involved. This approach will also deepen ties between care services and the community, ensuring that care is both relevant and rooted in the local context.


In summary, the demographic insights from Springfield Ward emphasize the need for culturally sensitive, flexible, and locally driven care services. By tapping into local resources, recruiting from within the community, and fostering strong relationships with local organizations and health services, the cooperative care model can achieve its goals of equitable, effective, and community-centered care.

PreviousGroup activitiesNextLocality analysis

Last updated 12 days ago

Was this helpful?