LogoLogo
  • Introduction
    • πŸ₯³Welcome to the playbook
    • πŸ“’Project background
    • What is co-operative care?
    • πŸ› οΈHow to use the playbook
    • A word from...
      • Equal Care
      • Clapton Care Commons
  • Start and Grow
    • 🚠Overview
    • 🌍Foundation
      • Founders
      • Find the others
      • Feasibility
      • Formation
    • Have a go
    • Find (more) money
    • Share the power
    • πŸŽ‹Grow
      • Recruit workers
      • Start teams
    • Sustain
  • Technology
    • Equal Care's Platform
    • Equal Care's technology journey
    • Choosing technologies
      • Social Care Platform Vendors
  • Fundraising
    • Fundraising options
    • Community Share Offers
      • Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
    • Commons Contribution
    • Restrictions on investment
  • Equal Care's Model
    • Our Purpose
    • How we work
    • Sociocracy
    • Circles
      • Long term decisions
      • Everyday decisions
      • Circle records
      • Consent
      • Proposals
    • Teams
      • Why we use the Teams model
      • Who's in?
      • Team Starting
        • The role of a Team Starter
        • 1. Starting a Team: The First Contact
        • 2. Beginning the Relationship
        • 3. Finding the Right Match
        • 4. Supportive Conversation & Trust Assessment
          • 4a. Example of a Supportive Conversation
          • 4b. Example of a Trust Assessment
        • 5. Profiles and promises
          • 5a. The Getting Support Promise
          • 5b. The Getting Support Profile
          • 5c. Worker and team member profiles
        • 6. Building a team
          • 6a. Finding and welcoming new members
          • 6b. Trialling new team members
        • 7. Getting Organised: Roles and Hats
        • 8. Stepping Back: Team Independence
      • Dealing with conflict and change
        • Conflict support
        • How to leave a team well
    • Hats
      • Team Hats
      • Circle Hats - Process
      • Circle Hats - Operational
        • Care Commons Organiser
        • Peer supervisor
    • Platform
    • Co-production
      • Implementing co-production
      • Context of co-production in social care
      • Governance for co-production
      • Ownership for co-production
    • Care Commons
    • Radical Candour
  • Evaluation framework
    • Introduction
    • Commons-based Care: the Context
    • Scope
      • Three Domains of Care Outcomes: Process, Change, and Maintenance.
      • Three Domains of Outcomes in Equal Care
      • Mapping Equal Care Outputs to Outcomes Domains
      • Social Climate as a Key Evaluative Lens
    • Evaluation Challenges
    • Methods
      • Social Climate Survey
      • Community Mapping
      • Interviews and workshops
      • Group activities
      • Community needs assessment
        • Locality analysis
    • Data Analysis
      • Interviews Outcome Domains
        • Growth Outcomes
        • Well-being, Relationships & Belonging Outcomes
        • Systems Maintenaince & Co-production Outcomes
      • Community Network Map: Analysis & Overview
        • Who’s in the Network?
        • Bridging the Gap Between Formal and Informal Care
        • Mapping Care Wealth
        • What We Learned from the Teams
        • The Role of Teams in the Community Care Network
        • Reflections and Future Directions
      • Reflections from the Ground: Insights from Key Circle Leads
        • Circle Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Teams Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Platform Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Commons Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
          • Care Commons Organiser Role Description
    • The Toolbox
      • Theory of Change
        • What is a Theory of Change?
          • Using a Theory of Change
        • Co-producing our Theory of Change
        • Observations about ToC Outcomes
        • How to use our interactive ToC
          • Orientation to ToC Tool: The Kumu Platform
            • Using the focus function in Kumu
            • Using Basic Control Functions
            • Toggling Between views
          • 1. Outputs Dimensions and Outcome Domains
          • 2. Coop Output Dimensions - a deeper dive.
          • 3. Coop Outcomes Domains. A deeper dive.
        • Using ToC tool to understand our model of care: Key Outputs.
        • Using ToC tool to understand our model of care: Key Outcomes
        • Using ToC tool to see how we measure outcomes
        • Using ToC tool to understand the impact of specific features of the coop
          • Circle ToC
          • Platform ToC
          • Teams ToC
          • Commons ToC
        • Using this tool for Strategy and Planning
      • Equal Care Coop's Social Climate Survey
        • About Equal Care's Social Climate
          • Why Measure Social Climate?
        • Interpreting Growth Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Interpreting Systems Maintenance and Co-production Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Interpreting Well-being, Relationships & Belonging Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Using the Social Climate Survey: Resources and Challenges.
        • List of Survey Items for all Stake Holders
      • Community Care Mapping Tool
      • Interview Templates
      • Atlas Care Maps
      • Co-Production Capacity Assessment Tool
        • 10 capacities for co-production
        • Using the tool
  • Service Specification
    • Care as a common pool resource
    • Service Spec
    • Service Map
  • Cost Model
    • Introduction
    • Resources
    • Fair wages
    • Cost Models in Social Care
  • Resources
    • Co-op operations
      • Communications
        • Roles
        • Tone of Voice
        • Digital Inclusion
        • Social Media
      • Learning
        • What you need to know
        • Peer to peer learning
    • Documentation
    • Care and Support Rates
    • Co-op rules & bylaws
    • Care Mapping with Atlas of Care
      • Care Mapping for Relationship-Centred Care
      • Care Mapping for new Teams
      • Care Mapping for Evaluation
    • Glossary
Powered by GitBook

Β© Equal Care Co-op Ltd 2025

On this page
  • What did we do?
  • What did we base it on?
  • How did we design it?
  • Why did we use this tool?

Was this helpful?

Export as PDF
  1. Evaluation framework
  2. Methods

Social Climate Survey

What did we do?

We developed a bespoke Social Climate Survey tailored to the values and dynamics of our cooperative care model. The survey was grounded in a social climate framework that recognises the unique interplay of:

  • πŸ«‚ Relationship-centred care

  • 🧭 Sociocratic governance

  • πŸ§‘β€πŸ€β€πŸ§‘ Multi-stakeholder ownership

  • 🀝 Co-production

Our goal was to reflect the lived experiences, values and aspirations of care recipients, care workers, families and volunteers, and ensure our service environment supports a genuinely inclusive and empowering climate.


What did we base it on?

We drew on a range of existing validated tools, adapting them to fit our cooperative structure and principles:

  • Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (SWEMWBS) A concise 7-item scale for measuring positive mental well-being, from optimism to social connection.

  • Person-Centred Care Inventory (PERCCI) A tool developed in partnership with people using care services to evaluate how well the service understands, involves and builds relationships with them.

  • Team Climate Inventory (TCI) A scale for understanding how team environments support trust, participation, innovation and shared goals.

  • Group Environment Scale (GES) Measures the quality of relationships, opportunities for personal growth, and how systems maintain or adapt within group settings.

However, none of these fully captured our cooperative governance, shared ownership, or co-production focus - so we adapted and expanded them into something new.


How did we design it?

We took an iterative and participatory approach, testing early drafts with participants and co-producing later versions together.

We also tailored the survey for four groups:

  • Family members

  • Care workers

  • Circle/team members

  • Volunteers


Why did we use this tool?

Surveys have limits - they don’t build trust in the way interviews can. But they do allow us to:

  • βœ… Include more people, beyond those selected for 1:1 interviews

  • βœ… Invite wide reflection on relationships, service experience, and community life

  • βœ… Create shared ownership of insight and learning

To avoid extractive use of people’s insights, we shared the results with everyone who completed the survey, and hosted collective workshops to explore the findings together.

This approach made the survey itself part of the process of building awareness and deepening relationships in our care model.

PreviousMethodsNextCommunity Mapping

Last updated 12 days ago

Was this helpful?