# Group activities
We organised group activities at two key points in the evaluation process. These sessions brought together care workers, people receiving support, family and friends, volunteers, community members, and local partner organisations. The aim was to ensure that participants helped shape what was measured - and how - and had a chance to reflect collectively on what had been learned.
***
## Group Activity 1: Co-producing our Theory of Change
In May 2023, we held a participatory workshop to map out our Theory of Change. Participants included care receivers, their families and friends, Equal Care workers, local volunteers, community members, and partner organisations.
### **What we did**
* **Rich picture mapping**: People visually mapped the current care system: who’s involved, what’s working, and where the challenges are.
* **Identifying change**: Participants shared what changes they’d like to see in care: more flexibility, stronger relationships, and better support were recurring themes.
* **Causal pathways**: Small groups worked on linking actions to outcomes, describing how specific activities could lead to real improvements.
* **Feedback and synthesis**: We refined the causal pathways collectively, shaping a shared Theory of Change that guided our entire evaluation.
### **Why we used this approach**
* It brought a wide range of voices into the design of the evaluation.
* It helped ensure that what we measured truly reflected what mattered to people.
* It fostered shared ownership and trust: the evaluation wasn’t something “done to” people, but built with them.
* It laid out a roadmap that made it easier for everyone to see how their contributions connected to broader outcomes.
### **Building the Commons**
This was not the first time we’d co-produced a Theory of Change. In 2019, we mapped our model around Platform, Circles, and Teams. In this session, we focused on the often invisible role of the wider community - the relationships and networks that help sustain care. This work helped to establish a fourth core dimension in our model: **the** **Commons**.
***
## Group Activity 2: Collective Reflection and Shared Priorities
Prioritisation activity with Circle Members at Evaluation Workshop
In July 2024, we ran a half-day workshop at Liberty Hall with Circle Members: care workers, care owners, and local coordinators. This session was designed to help people reflect together on their experience of the project, explore how they felt about it, and share their hopes for the future.
### **Activities included:**
* **Making flower hats**: Using flowers from Walthamstow Marshes, we made wearable ‘hats’ that became metaphors for our roles in the project. Everyone took a turn describing their role, responsibilities, and how they had changed.
* **Flower / Thorn / Bud**: A group reflection exercise where people shared one thing that had gone well (flower), one challenge (thorn), and one hope (bud).
* **Cooking and eating together**: We made pavlova and shared a meal - because connection and care also happen around food.
* **Washing line priorities**: Participants hung hand-drawn "clothing" items on a line strung between trees, each representing a different factor (e.g. “I feel optimistic” or “We make decisions effectively”). Together, they arranged these in order of importance.
***
'Flower hats' activity with Circle Members at Evaluation Workshop
### Why we used this evaluation tool
**Sharing power**
For a project grounded in co-production, it was vital that the evaluation process reflected those same values. Group activities helped shift power by involving people directly in deciding what should be measured and how the findings were interpreted.
**Building trust and understanding**
While interviews gave us deep individual stories, group workshops helped build a shared understanding. They allowed people to hear different perspectives, reflect together, and feel more connected to each other and the project.
**Making evaluation relational**
Rather than treating evaluation as extractive, we aimed to make it social and reciprocal. By returning to people with early findings, and offering space for response and discussion, we made the process more transparent and meaningful.
Flower/Thorn/Bud discussion exercise at Evaluation Workshop
---
# Agent Instructions: Querying This Documentation
If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.
Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter:
```
GET https://play.equal.care/evaluation-framework/methods/group-activities.md?ask=
```
The question should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.
Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.