LogoLogo
  • Introduction
    • 🥳Welcome to the playbook
    • đź“’Project background
    • What is co-operative care?
    • 🛠️How to use the playbook
    • A word from...
      • Equal Care
      • Clapton Care Commons
  • Start and Grow
    • đźš Overview
    • 🌍Foundation
      • Founders
      • Find the others
      • Feasibility
      • Formation
    • Have a go
    • Find (more) money
    • Share the power
    • 🎋Grow
      • Recruit workers
      • Start teams
    • Sustain
  • Technology
    • Equal Care's Platform
    • Equal Care's technology journey
    • Choosing technologies
      • Social Care Platform Vendors
  • Fundraising
    • Fundraising options
    • Community Share Offers
      • Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
    • Commons Contribution
    • Restrictions on investment
  • Equal Care's Model
    • Our Purpose
    • How we work
    • Sociocracy
    • Circles
      • Long term decisions
      • Everyday decisions
      • Circle records
      • Consent
      • Proposals
    • Teams
      • Why we use the Teams model
      • Who's in?
      • Team Starting
        • The role of a Team Starter
        • 1. Starting a Team: The First Contact
        • 2. Beginning the Relationship
        • 3. Finding the Right Match
        • 4. Supportive Conversation & Trust Assessment
          • 4a. Example of a Supportive Conversation
          • 4b. Example of a Trust Assessment
        • 5. Profiles and promises
          • 5a. The Getting Support Promise
          • 5b. The Getting Support Profile
          • 5c. Worker and team member profiles
        • 6. Building a team
          • 6a. Finding and welcoming new members
          • 6b. Trialling new team members
        • 7. Getting Organised: Roles and Hats
        • 8. Stepping Back: Team Independence
      • Dealing with conflict and change
        • Conflict support
        • How to leave a team well
    • Hats
      • Team Hats
      • Circle Hats - Process
      • Circle Hats - Operational
        • Care Commons Organiser
        • Peer supervisor
    • Platform
    • Co-production
      • Implementing co-production
      • Context of co-production in social care
      • Governance for co-production
      • Ownership for co-production
    • Care Commons
    • Radical Candour
  • Evaluation framework
    • Introduction
    • Commons-based Care: the Context
    • Scope
      • Three Domains of Care Outcomes: Process, Change, and Maintenance.
      • Three Domains of Outcomes in Equal Care
      • Mapping Equal Care Outputs to Outcomes Domains
      • Social Climate as a Key Evaluative Lens
    • Evaluation Challenges
    • Methods
      • Social Climate Survey
      • Community Mapping
      • Interviews and workshops
      • Group activities
      • Community needs assessment
        • Locality analysis
    • Data Analysis
      • Interviews Outcome Domains
        • Growth Outcomes
        • Well-being, Relationships & Belonging Outcomes
        • Systems Maintenaince & Co-production Outcomes
      • Community Network Map: Analysis & Overview
        • Who’s in the Network?
        • Bridging the Gap Between Formal and Informal Care
        • Mapping Care Wealth
        • What We Learned from the Teams
        • The Role of Teams in the Community Care Network
        • Reflections and Future Directions
      • Reflections from the Ground: Insights from Key Circle Leads
        • Circle Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Teams Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Platform Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Commons Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
          • Care Commons Organiser Role Description
    • The Toolbox
      • Theory of Change
        • What is a Theory of Change?
          • Using a Theory of Change
        • Co-producing our Theory of Change
        • Observations about ToC Outcomes
        • How to use our interactive ToC
          • Orientation to ToC Tool: The Kumu Platform
            • Using the focus function in Kumu
            • Using Basic Control Functions
            • Toggling Between views
          • 1. Outputs Dimensions and Outcome Domains
          • 2. Coop Output Dimensions - a deeper dive.
          • 3. Coop Outcomes Domains. A deeper dive.
        • Using ToC tool to understand our model of care: Key Outputs.
        • Using ToC tool to understand our model of care: Key Outcomes
        • Using ToC tool to see how we measure outcomes
        • Using ToC tool to understand the impact of specific features of the coop
          • Circle ToC
          • Platform ToC
          • Teams ToC
          • Commons ToC
        • Using this tool for Strategy and Planning
      • Equal Care Coop's Social Climate Survey
        • About Equal Care's Social Climate
          • Why Measure Social Climate?
        • Interpreting Growth Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Interpreting Systems Maintenance and Co-production Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Interpreting Well-being, Relationships & Belonging Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Using the Social Climate Survey: Resources and Challenges.
        • List of Survey Items for all Stake Holders
      • Community Care Mapping Tool
      • Interview Templates
      • Atlas Care Maps
      • Co-Production Capacity Assessment Tool
        • 10 capacities for co-production
        • Using the tool
  • Service Specification
    • Care as a common pool resource
    • Service Spec
    • Service Map
  • Cost Model
    • Introduction
    • Resources
    • Fair wages
    • Cost Models in Social Care
  • Resources
    • Co-op operations
      • Communications
        • Roles
        • Tone of Voice
        • Digital Inclusion
        • Social Media
      • Learning
        • What you need to know
        • Peer to peer learning
    • Documentation
    • Care and Support Rates
    • Co-op rules & bylaws
    • Care Mapping with Atlas of Care
      • Care Mapping for Relationship-Centred Care
      • Care Mapping for new Teams
      • Care Mapping for Evaluation
    • Glossary
Powered by GitBook

© Equal Care Co-op Ltd 2025

On this page

Was this helpful?

Export as PDF
  1. Evaluation framework
  2. The Toolbox

Community Care Mapping Tool

PreviousList of Survey Items for all Stake HoldersNextInterview Templates

Last updated 11 days ago

Was this helpful?

Developed and refined during our Clapton Commons pilot, this interactive community-mapping tool harnesses Kumu’s system-mapping capabilities to surface—and strengthen—the often-invisible networks of care and support in Upper Clapton. We now offer it as a flexible template for other care providers, community groups, and local initiatives to visualize their own “care wealth” and foster deeper collaboration.

By adopting this care-mapping template, your organisation can quickly illuminate local care ecosystems, strengthen cooperative ties, and harness community assets for more abundant, commons-based support. Whether you’re a small grassroots collective or an established provider, this tool empowers you to see—and shape—the social architecture of care in your own neighbourhood.

Use the link here to open in your browser.

A different version of this tool, more aligned to our specification for A Care Commons Service can be found in the Service Map page.

Rationale for Developing and Using the Care-Mapping Tool

In many communities, formal care services—healthcare providers, social workers, and professional organizations—operate in silos, rendering their work largely invisible to the very networks of family, friends, and volunteers that also provide care. This fragmentation prevents care workers from tapping into rich, grassroots support systems and limits opportunities for collaboration that could enrich and extend their impact.

Structural constraints—tight schedules, regulatory boundaries, and the lack of shared communication channels—further isolate formal providers from informal caregivers. As a result, unpaid acts of support go unrecognized, and community-based resources remain underutilized, weakening the overall resilience and responsiveness of the local care ecosystem.

Our interactive care-mapping tool was designed to break down these barriers by visualizing every connection—paid or volunteer, professional or personal—that contributes to someone’s well-being. By integrating formal services with informal networks on a single, dynamic platform, the tool makes hidden “care wealth” visible, promotes cross-sector collaboration, and builds trust between all participants.

Through this shared map, care providers can discover and coordinate with local volunteers, mutual-aid groups, and cultural organizations, transforming care from a narrowly task-focused service into a holistic, relationship-centered model. Ultimately, the tool enriches the quality of care by ensuring resources flow freely across formal and informal boundaries, supporting not only physical needs but also emotional, social, and cultural well-being.

Measuring “Care Wealth”

“Care wealth” encompasses the full spectrum of activities—paid, unpaid, formal, and informal—that sustain individual and community well-being. Our mapping tool makes this hidden economy visible by:

  • Documenting Diverse Care Roles

    • Users tag each node with the types of care provided: from psychologists and home-health aides to mutual-aid groups and volunteer companions.

    • Family and kinship contributions (informal financial help, childcare, elder support) are captured alongside professional services.

  • Tracking Care Flows

    • Connections between nodes record how care moves through the network—whether via formal partnerships (e.g., between agencies) or informal assistance (e.g., neighbors helping with groceries).

    • This flow data reveals where care wealth is generated, how it’s sustained, and where pockets of need or untapped capacity exist.

  • Visualizing Interdependence

    • By overlaying role and connection fields, the map highlights the interlocking relationships that underpin community resilience—showing how each act of care contributes to a collective safety net.

Through these features, the tool transforms abstract care labor into concrete, data-driven insights—empowering communities to recognize, value, and strategically bolster their own care wealth.

Other Key Functions

Relationship Visualization

  • Displays formal and informal care actors (paid workers, volunteers, family, community groups) as nodes.

  • Renders their connections—from casual contact to sustained collaboration—so coordinators can spot gaps and opportunities.

Resource Discovery & Matching

  • Filters highlight local assets (e.g., transport services, befriending programs, faith groups) against care recipients’ needs and preferences.

  • Supports asset-based community development by matching resources to mapped needs.

Social Impact Tracking

  • Enables Social Network Analysis (SNA) to monitor changes in connectivity, cohesion, and “care density” over time.

  • Provides visual benchmarks for measuring pilot goals, such as new cooperative ties or increased volunteer engagement.

Commons-Based Coordination

  • Promotes a local “gift economy”—tagged nodes and links record both paid services and “gifted” time (e.g., volunteer floristry sessions).

  • Helps teams track cumulative informal contributions, making a community’s collective care visible and valued.

Core Benefits

Makes Invisible Networks Visible

  • Comprehensive Actor Inventory: Captures formal providers (care agencies, social workers) alongside informal supporters (family, neighbors, volunteers), ensuring every contributor to well-being is documented.

  • Uncovers Hidden Resources: Surfaces grassroots initiatives—mutual aid groups, faith-based volunteers, hobby clubs—that rarely appear in official directories but play a vital care role.

  • Visualizes Care Flows: Uses network diagrams to show how support moves between actors, revealing central “hubs,” under-connected nodes, and potential collaboration pathways.

Strengthens Local Collaboration

  • Identifies Synergies: Highlights overlapping missions or complementary services (e.g., a food-delivery volunteer and a medical transport provider) to seed joint initiatives.

  • Facilitates Pooled Resources: Encourages shared use of assets—meeting spaces, vehicles, equipment—by mapping who owns what and where capacity exists.

  • Accelerates Partnership Building: Provides a common reference point for introductions and co-planning, reducing the time and effort typically needed to establish trust.

Empowers Community Ownership

  • User-Driven Updates: Enables care recipients, family members, and volunteers to add or edit nodes and connections, keeping the map current and grounded in lived experience.

  • Democratizes Data: Shifts map maintenance from a single authority to a collaborative process, so community members directly shape how their networks are represented.

  • Fosters Stewardship: By giving local actors control over the map’s evolution, it builds a sense of custodianship and accountability for sustaining the care commons.

Supports Data-Driven Planning

  • Real-Time Insights: Offers live dashboards and snapshots of network density, connection growth, and service gaps to inform outreach strategies.

  • Targeted Volunteer Recruitment: Uses filterable views (e.g., by geography, skill set, or service type) to pinpoint areas with unmet demand and recruit volunteers or partners accordingly.

  • Evidence for Funding & Policy: Generates exportable visuals and metrics (e.g., number of unique connections, types of care provided) to demonstrate impact to funders, commissioners, and decision-makers.

Offers Flexibility and Adaptability

  • Customizable Fields & Views: Users can tailor node attributes, connection types, and visual layouts to match their unique care contexts—whether tracking clinical services, volunteer roles, or community events.

  • Scalable Across Contexts: Equally effective for small neighborhood initiatives or larger multi-agency collaborations; teams can start simple and layer in complexity as their needs evolve.

  • Easy Template Duplication: New care providers or community groups can duplicate the base map—complete with preset fields and filters—and immediately customize it with their own data.

  • Ongoing Evolution: As local priorities or organizational structures change, the map can be reconfigured on the fly, ensuring it remains a living tool that grows alongside the community.

How to Access and Use the Care Mapping Tool

To begin, visit Kumu’s website and sign up for a free account. This will give you access to the platform’s basic features, which are sufficient for exploring and using the care mapping tool.

2. Access the Project

Once logged in, search for the Clapton Common Care Map or use the direct link provided by the project administrator. You will be able to view the map and explore the connections between the different care organizations, groups, and individuals.

3. Fork the Project

To adapt the tool for your own needs:

• Click on the “Fork” button in the top-right corner of the project page. This will create a copy of the map in your own Kumu account.

• Once forked, you can customize the map by adding your own elements (organizations, groups, care teams) and connections, tailoring it to reflect your local care network.

4. Adapt the Template

With your own copy of the map, you can:

• Modify the existing relationships to reflect your local context.

• Add or remove elements based on your community’s needs.

• Edit labels, descriptions, and categories to suit the structure and language of your care network.

5. Collaborate with Others

You can invite other community members to collaborate on your map by sharing the project link or granting them editing access. This fosters a collective approach to building and maintaining the care network.

By forking the project and adapting the template, you can use this care mapping tool to explore and enhance your own community’s care landscape.

How to Use the Mapping Tool

The Kumu platform is used to create an interactive relationship map, not a geographical one. It is designed to represent and analyze complex networks, focusing on how people, organizations, and teams within the community are interconnected.

Key Elements:

  • Organization: Includes local services, religious centers, community organizations, and businesses

  • Group: Refers to informal collectives and incoorporated groups such as mutual aid, peer support of community groups.

  • Supported Person: Refers to the people in receipt of regulated care and support living within the locality.

  • Business: refers to any business that may play a role in someones care and support or the well-being and or resilience of the community network as a whole.

  • Person: refers to local residents, friends, family or volunteers that play a role in supoporting someone or the community network as a whole.

  • Regulated Care Provider: Licensed or registered agencies and professionals (e.g., home-care agencies, domiciliary nurses, adult day-care centers) whose services comply with formal oversight bodies (such as the CQC in England).

Connections:

  • Thin solid lines represent a confirmed connection or past collaborations

  • Thick solid lines represent an active connection, involving an ongoing collaboration that is generating value

  • Dashed lines indicate pending or yet-to-be-established relationships.

Narrative Pop-Ups

Each node on the map can display a rich information card—known as a narrative pop-up—when clicked. Click on any Node or connections and read the Profile Panel, which includes:

  • Biography: A brief description of who this actor is and their role in the community.

  • Services Offered: A list of formal or informal supports they provide (e.g., meal delivery, companionship, clinical care).

  • Care-Related Notes: Contextual details such as accessibility considerations, cultural preferences, or history of collaboration.

Filter the map to focus on specific care modalities, activities, or statuses:

  • Care Type: Formal vs. informal providers

  • Activity: Transport, social events, clinical support, volunteer befriending, etc.

  • Status: Active, inactive, or emerging actors Combine filters and keyword search (e.g., “dementia”) to drill down into exactly the network slice you need.

Layouts & Views Choose from multiple preset layouts to reveal different patterns:

  • Radial: Centers on one node and arranges connected nodes in concentric rings—ideal for mapping an individual’s support network.

  • Cluster: Automatically groups nodes by shared tags or connection density—useful for spotting service clusters (e.g., all local befriending groups).

  • Geospatial Proxy: Arranges nodes roughly according to their real-world locations—helpful for planning local outreach.

Export & Share Options

  • Snapshot Export (PDF/PNG): Capture the current view for reports or presentations—select resolution and page size before downloading.

  • Embed Live Map: Copy the embed code to display an interactive version on your website or intranet.

  • Duplication Link: Generate a “Make a Copy” URL so other groups can fork the template with all fields and filters intact.

  • Permissioned Links: Create read-only or editor links to control who can view or update the map.

Collaborative Editing Role-based permissions enable secure teamwork:

  • Administrator: Full control over map settings, user roles, and templates.

  • Editor: Can add/edit nodes and connections, update profile fields, and comment.

  • Viewer: Read-only access for safe sharing with external stakeholders. Additional features include real-time simultaneous editing, threaded comments on nodes/connections, and a version history for rollback or audit.

Challenges and Opportunities

The mapping tool presents both opportunities for enhanced community collaboration and challenges related to implementation.

Challenges:

  • Resource Limitations: Gathering and updating data requires substantial time and effort from both care mappers and community members. It is highly unlikely that individual care provider will have this capacity, partnerships with local anchor community organizations are therefore essential for its use.

  • Community Engagement: Ensuring participation from local organizations and individuals can be difficult, especially if they don’t immediately perceive the map’s benefits or don't feel confident in using tech.

  • Evolving Relationships: Connections in the community are dynamic, constantly changing as new relationships form or old ones dissolve. Updating the map to reflect these changes is time-consuming.

Opportunities:

  • Collaborative Networks: By working with local partners and using collective knowledge, the mapping process can be more efficient and engaging.

  • Care Wealth Visibility: The tool brings visibility to “care wealth,” highlighting the often-unseen value of both paid and unpaid care activities.

  • Building a Care Commons: The map supports the creation of a local Care Commons by visualizing the community care network and encouraging collaborative stewardship of care resources.

  • Enriching Care Beyond Task-Based Support: Collaborating with local community networks allows care providers to offer more holistic, relationship-centered care, addressing not just physical but also emotional and social needs. This enhances the overall care experience, promoting well-being and deeper connections for those receiving care.

Ongoing Maintenance and Use

The map requires regular updates to remain relevant, which can be achieved through scheduled check-ins with participants and by encouraging self-updates via Kumu. Training sessions for community members can also help them engage with the tool effectively, ensuring that the map reflects the evolving nature of local care networks.

By addressing challenges, leveraging local collaborations, and fostering ongoing engagement, the care mapping tool can become an integral part of sustaining and strengthening care networks in the community.