LogoLogo
  • Introduction
    • 🥳Welcome to the playbook
    • 📒Project background
    • What is co-operative care?
    • 🛠️How to use the playbook
    • A word from...
      • Equal Care
      • Clapton Care Commons
  • Start and Grow
    • 🚠Overview
    • 🌍Foundation
      • Founders
      • Find the others
      • Feasibility
      • Formation
    • Have a go
    • Find (more) money
    • Share the power
    • 🎋Grow
      • Recruit workers
      • Start teams
    • Sustain
  • Technology
    • Equal Care's Platform
    • Equal Care's technology journey
    • Choosing technologies
      • Social Care Platform Vendors
  • Fundraising
    • Fundraising options
    • Community Share Offers
      • Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
    • Commons Contribution
    • Restrictions on investment
  • Equal Care's Model
    • Our Purpose
    • How we work
    • Sociocracy
    • Circles
      • Long term decisions
      • Everyday decisions
      • Circle records
      • Consent
      • Proposals
    • Teams
      • Why we use the Teams model
      • Who's in?
      • Team Starting
        • The role of a Team Starter
        • 1. Starting a Team: The First Contact
        • 2. Beginning the Relationship
        • 3. Finding the Right Match
        • 4. Supportive Conversation & Trust Assessment
          • 4a. Example of a Supportive Conversation
          • 4b. Example of a Trust Assessment
        • 5. Profiles and promises
          • 5a. The Getting Support Promise
          • 5b. The Getting Support Profile
          • 5c. Worker and team member profiles
        • 6. Building a team
          • 6a. Finding and welcoming new members
          • 6b. Trialling new team members
        • 7. Getting Organised: Roles and Hats
        • 8. Stepping Back: Team Independence
      • Dealing with conflict and change
        • Conflict support
        • How to leave a team well
    • Hats
      • Team Hats
      • Circle Hats - Process
      • Circle Hats - Operational
        • Care Commons Organiser
        • Peer supervisor
    • Platform
    • Co-production
      • Implementing co-production
      • Context of co-production in social care
      • Governance for co-production
      • Ownership for co-production
    • Care Commons
    • Radical Candour
  • Evaluation framework
    • Introduction
    • Commons-based Care: the Context
    • Scope
      • Three Domains of Care Outcomes: Process, Change, and Maintenance.
      • Three Domains of Outcomes in Equal Care
      • Mapping Equal Care Outputs to Outcomes Domains
      • Social Climate as a Key Evaluative Lens
    • Evaluation Challenges
    • Methods
      • Social Climate Survey
      • Community Mapping
      • Interviews and workshops
      • Group activities
      • Community needs assessment
        • Locality analysis
    • Data Analysis
      • Interviews Outcome Domains
        • Growth Outcomes
        • Well-being, Relationships & Belonging Outcomes
        • Systems Maintenaince & Co-production Outcomes
      • Community Network Map: Analysis & Overview
        • Who’s in the Network?
        • Bridging the Gap Between Formal and Informal Care
        • Mapping Care Wealth
        • What We Learned from the Teams
        • The Role of Teams in the Community Care Network
        • Reflections and Future Directions
      • Reflections from the Ground: Insights from Key Circle Leads
        • Circle Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Teams Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Platform Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Commons Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
          • Care Commons Organiser Role Description
    • The Toolbox
      • Theory of Change
        • What is a Theory of Change?
          • Using a Theory of Change
        • Co-producing our Theory of Change
        • Observations about ToC Outcomes
        • How to use our interactive ToC
          • Orientation to ToC Tool: The Kumu Platform
            • Using the focus function in Kumu
            • Using Basic Control Functions
            • Toggling Between views
          • 1. Outputs Dimensions and Outcome Domains
          • 2. Coop Output Dimensions - a deeper dive.
          • 3. Coop Outcomes Domains. A deeper dive.
        • Using ToC tool to understand our model of care: Key Outputs.
        • Using ToC tool to understand our model of care: Key Outcomes
        • Using ToC tool to see how we measure outcomes
        • Using ToC tool to understand the impact of specific features of the coop
          • Circle ToC
          • Platform ToC
          • Teams ToC
          • Commons ToC
        • Using this tool for Strategy and Planning
      • Equal Care Coop's Social Climate Survey
        • About Equal Care's Social Climate
          • Why Measure Social Climate?
        • Interpreting Growth Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Interpreting Systems Maintenance and Co-production Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Interpreting Well-being, Relationships & Belonging Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Using the Social Climate Survey: Resources and Challenges.
        • List of Survey Items for all Stake Holders
      • Community Care Mapping Tool
      • Interview Templates
      • Atlas Care Maps
      • Co-Production Capacity Assessment Tool
        • 10 capacities for co-production
        • Using the tool
  • Service Specification
    • Care as a common pool resource
    • Service Spec
    • Service Map
  • Cost Model
    • Introduction
    • Resources
    • Fair wages
    • Cost Models in Social Care
  • Resources
    • Co-op operations
      • Communications
        • Roles
        • Tone of Voice
        • Digital Inclusion
        • Social Media
      • Learning
        • What you need to know
        • Peer to peer learning
    • Documentation
    • Care and Support Rates
    • Co-op rules & bylaws
    • Care Mapping with Atlas of Care
      • Care Mapping for Relationship-Centred Care
      • Care Mapping for new Teams
      • Care Mapping for Evaluation
    • Glossary
Powered by GitBook

© Equal Care Co-op Ltd 2025

On this page

Was this helpful?

Export as PDF
  1. Evaluation framework
  2. The Toolbox
  3. Equal Care Coop's Social Climate Survey
  4. Interpreting Well-being, Relationships & Belonging Measures

Low Score Interpretation

Low Score Interpretation:

A low score in the Well-being, Relationships & Belonging Outcome Domain indicates significant challenges in fostering a nurturing and inclusive environment that supports the holistic well-being of individuals. This scenario reflects a lack of strong relationships, community connection, and overall well-being.

This situation is characterized by several key factors:

A low well-being score highlights significant struggles in mental and emotional health for everyone involved. Negative thoughts and feelings, weak social connections and a stressed states of mind are common among team members with many feeling unsupported. There is a high risk of overwhelm, despondency and burn-out. The social climate may be depleting well-being rather than promoting it.

Care and support workers frequently experience negative emotions such as sadness and pessimism. They struggle to maintain positive social relationships within the team and often feel isolated and unsupported. Decision-making and problem-solving abilities are compromised by high levels of stress. Overall, the work atmosphere fails to support their mental and emotional health.

"Honestly, work is tough. I often feel sad and pessimistic. It’s hard to maintain good relationships, and I feel isolated and unsupported a lot. I am often too stressed to be clear-headed and make good decisions. We don’t have enough resources or opportunities to nurture my well-being. The environment just isn’t supportive enough."

Care receivers often face negative emotions and weak social relationships. They feel isolated and unsupported, with limited access to resources or experiences that could enhance their well-being. Confusion and unclear thinking are common, contributing to a sense of helplessness and disempowerment. The environment does not adequately support their mental and emotional health, leading to significant challenges in achieving a positive well-being.

"I often feel down and disconnected from others. I don’t get the support I need, and I feel pretty isolated. My thoughts are often unclear, and I feel helpless about my care. There aren’t enough resources to help me feel better, and it’s really affecting my well-being."

Family members, friends, and volunteers frequently experience negative emotions and weak social connections within the cooperative. They feel isolated, unsupported, and pessimistic about the team and/or wider coop. The environment fails to provide the necessary support for their well-being, resulting in substantial barriers to their participation and engagement in the care process.

"I often feel sad and cut off from the cooperative. There’s not much support, and I feel pessimistic about being involved. The lack of resources and clear communication makes everything confusing and overwhelming. It feels like the environment just isn’t set up to support us properly."

Negative thoughts and feelings, weak social connections and a stressed states of mind are common among circle members with many feeling unsupported. There is a high risk of overwhelm, despondency and burn-out. The social climate of the circle may be depleting well-being rather than promoting it.

"It feels like negative thoughts and feelings are pretty common, and a lot of us feel unsupported. Our social connections aren't strong, and we're often stressed out. There's a high risk of getting overwhelmed, feeling down, and burning out. Instead of boosting our well-being, the vibe here seems to be dragging us down."

Relationships between caregivers and care recipients are strained, with minimal support and empathy. Power imbalances dominate these interactions, leading to a lack of mutual empowerment and weakened relational dynamics.

Care and support workers find it challenging to build strong, empathetic relationships with care recipients because the system does not support or value these connections. Power dynamics often place them in a position of authority rather than partnership.

"I find it challenging to build strong, empathetic relationships with care recipients because the system doesn't support or value these connections. Power dynamics often place me in a position of authority rather than partnership."

Care receivers feel that their relationships with caregivers are transactional rather than supportive. There is little empathy or understanding, and they often feel disempowered and unheard.

"My relationship with my caregiver feels transactional rather than supportive. There's little empathy or understanding, and I often feel disempowered and unheard."

Family members and friends notice that the caregiving relationships their loved ones experience lack warmth and genuine support, which adds to their concerns about overall well-being.

"We notice that the caregiving relationships our loved ones experience lack warmth and genuine support. This disconnect adds to our concerns about their overall well-being."

Circles with low scores have weak or strained working relationships. Support is inconsistent, and there may be a lack of trust and empathy between circle members. Poor communication and insufficient sharing of skills and unequal distribution ofg roles and responsibities contribute to negative experiences and dissatisfaction within the circle.

"Our working relationships feel weak or strained. Support is inconsistent, and there's often a lack of trust and empathy between circle members. Poor communication and not sharing Circle Hats enough lead to negative experiences and dissatisfaction."

There is a lack of inclusive practices, leading to poor group cohesion and a weak sense of belonging. Power dynamics create disparities within groups, preventing a unified and supportive community atmosphere.

Care and support workers find it hard to work as a cohesive team due to the lack of inclusive practices. Clear power imbalances prevent effective collaboration and mutual support.

"The lack of inclusive practices makes it hard to work as a cohesive team. There are clear power imbalances that prevent us from collaborating effectively and supporting each other."

Care receivers often feel isolated within the care environment, experiencing little sense of community and frequent exclusion from group activities and decisions.

"I feel isolated within the care environment. There's little sense of community, and I often feel excluded from group activities and decisions."

Family members and friends see their loved ones struggling to connect with others in the care environment. The lack of group unity and inclusive practices makes it difficult for them to feel a sense of belonging.

"We see our loved ones struggling to connect with others in the care environment. The lack of group unity and inclusive practices makes it difficult for them to feel a sense of belonging."

Low-scoring circles struggle with group unity and cohesion. Members often feel disconnected or isolated, and conflicts are common. There is a lack of regular team-building activities and poor communication. The semi-autonomous operation from the wider coop and the distribution of Circle Hats are ineffective, leading to a fragmented and unsupportive environment.

"We really struggle with group unity and cohesion. Many of us feel disconnected or isolated, and conflicts happen a lot. We don't have regular team-building activities, and communication is poor. The way we operate semi-autonomously from the wider coop and distribute Circle Hats just isn't working, leading to a fragmented and unsupportive environment."

Individuals struggle to connect with broader community networks due to power dynamics that hinder social integration. There is minimal facilitation of community connections, leading to a weak sense of belonging and social support.

Care and support workers wish for more opportunities to integrate the people they care for into the broader community. The current system's lack of support limits these connections, which in turn affects their sense of belonging and social support.

"I wish there were more opportunities to integrate the people I care for into the broader community. The current system doesn't support these connections, which limits their sense of belonging and social support."

Care receivers feel disconnected from the wider community. There is little effort to help them build social connections outside of the care setting, leading to feelings of isolation.

"I feel disconnected from the wider community. There's little effort to help me build social connections outside of the care setting, which leaves me feeling isolated."

Family members and friends desire for their loved ones to be part of the broader community, but the lack of support and facilitation makes this challenging. As a result, their loved ones miss out on vital social interactions.

"We want our loved ones to be part of the broader community, but the lack of support and facilitation makes this challenging. They miss out on social interactions that are vital for their well-being."

Low-scoring circles fail to effectively integrate members into broader community networks. Connections with local resources are weak or nonexistent, and members often feel disconnected from the wider community. There is a lack of community events and partnerships, leading to minimal community engagement and a sense of belonging.

"We struggle to connect members with broader community networks. Our ties with local resources are weak or nonexistent, leaving many of us feeling isolated. There aren't enough community events or partnerships, which means we have minimal engagement from the wider community".

Overall, a low score reflects a social climate where individuals experience significant barriers to well-being, strong relationships, and community integration, primarily due to systemic power imbalances.

PreviousInterpreting Well-being, Relationships & Belonging MeasuresNextMedium Score Interpretation

Last updated 10 months ago

Was this helpful?