LogoLogo
  • Introduction
    • 🥳Welcome to the playbook
    • 📒Project background
    • What is co-operative care?
    • 🛠️How to use the playbook
    • A word from...
      • Equal Care
      • Clapton Care Commons
  • Start and Grow
    • 🚠Overview
    • 🌍Foundation
      • Founders
      • Find the others
      • Feasibility
      • Formation
    • Have a go
    • Find (more) money
    • Share the power
    • 🎋Grow
      • Recruit workers
      • Start teams
    • Sustain
  • Technology
    • Equal Care's Platform
    • Equal Care's technology journey
    • Choosing technologies
      • Social Care Platform Vendors
  • Fundraising
    • Fundraising options
    • Community Share Offers
      • Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
    • Commons Contribution
    • Restrictions on investment
  • Equal Care's Model
    • Our Purpose
    • How we work
    • Sociocracy
    • Circles
      • Long term decisions
      • Everyday decisions
      • Circle records
      • Consent
      • Proposals
    • Teams
      • Why we use the Teams model
      • Who's in?
      • Team Starting
        • The role of a Team Starter
        • 1. Starting a Team: The First Contact
        • 2. Beginning the Relationship
        • 3. Finding the Right Match
        • 4. Supportive Conversation & Trust Assessment
          • 4a. Example of a Supportive Conversation
          • 4b. Example of a Trust Assessment
        • 5. Profiles and promises
          • 5a. The Getting Support Promise
          • 5b. The Getting Support Profile
          • 5c. Worker and team member profiles
        • 6. Building a team
          • 6a. Finding and welcoming new members
          • 6b. Trialling new team members
        • 7. Getting Organised: Roles and Hats
        • 8. Stepping Back: Team Independence
      • Dealing with conflict and change
        • Conflict support
        • How to leave a team well
    • Hats
      • Team Hats
      • Circle Hats - Process
      • Circle Hats - Operational
        • Care Commons Organiser
        • Peer supervisor
    • Platform
    • Co-production
      • Implementing co-production
      • Context of co-production in social care
      • Governance for co-production
      • Ownership for co-production
    • Care Commons
    • Radical Candour
  • Evaluation framework
    • Introduction
    • Commons-based Care: the Context
    • Scope
      • Three Domains of Care Outcomes: Process, Change, and Maintenance.
      • Three Domains of Outcomes in Equal Care
      • Mapping Equal Care Outputs to Outcomes Domains
      • Social Climate as a Key Evaluative Lens
    • Evaluation Challenges
    • Methods
      • Social Climate Survey
      • Community Mapping
      • Interviews and workshops
      • Group activities
      • Community needs assessment
        • Locality analysis
    • Data Analysis
      • Interviews Outcome Domains
        • Growth Outcomes
        • Well-being, Relationships & Belonging Outcomes
        • Systems Maintenaince & Co-production Outcomes
      • Community Network Map: Analysis & Overview
        • Who’s in the Network?
        • Bridging the Gap Between Formal and Informal Care
        • Mapping Care Wealth
        • What We Learned from the Teams
        • The Role of Teams in the Community Care Network
        • Reflections and Future Directions
      • Reflections from the Ground: Insights from Key Circle Leads
        • Circle Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Teams Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Platform Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
        • Commons Outputs: Experiences & Learnings from the Clapton Circle.
          • Care Commons Organiser Role Description
    • The Toolbox
      • Theory of Change
        • What is a Theory of Change?
          • Using a Theory of Change
        • Co-producing our Theory of Change
        • Observations about ToC Outcomes
        • How to use our interactive ToC
          • Orientation to ToC Tool: The Kumu Platform
            • Using the focus function in Kumu
            • Using Basic Control Functions
            • Toggling Between views
          • 1. Outputs Dimensions and Outcome Domains
          • 2. Coop Output Dimensions - a deeper dive.
          • 3. Coop Outcomes Domains. A deeper dive.
        • Using ToC tool to understand our model of care: Key Outputs.
        • Using ToC tool to understand our model of care: Key Outcomes
        • Using ToC tool to see how we measure outcomes
        • Using ToC tool to understand the impact of specific features of the coop
          • Circle ToC
          • Platform ToC
          • Teams ToC
          • Commons ToC
        • Using this tool for Strategy and Planning
      • Equal Care Coop's Social Climate Survey
        • About Equal Care's Social Climate
          • Why Measure Social Climate?
        • Interpreting Growth Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Interpreting Systems Maintenance and Co-production Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Interpreting Well-being, Relationships & Belonging Measures
          • Low Score Interpretation
          • Medium Score Interpretation
          • High Score Interpretation
        • Using the Social Climate Survey: Resources and Challenges.
        • List of Survey Items for all Stake Holders
      • Community Care Mapping Tool
      • Interview Templates
      • Atlas Care Maps
      • Co-Production Capacity Assessment Tool
        • 10 capacities for co-production
        • Using the tool
  • Service Specification
    • Care as a common pool resource
    • Service Spec
    • Service Map
  • Cost Model
    • Introduction
    • Resources
    • Fair wages
    • Cost Models in Social Care
  • Resources
    • Co-op operations
      • Communications
        • Roles
        • Tone of Voice
        • Digital Inclusion
        • Social Media
      • Learning
        • What you need to know
        • Peer to peer learning
    • Documentation
    • Care and Support Rates
    • Co-op rules & bylaws
    • Care Mapping with Atlas of Care
      • Care Mapping for Relationship-Centred Care
      • Care Mapping for new Teams
      • Care Mapping for Evaluation
    • Glossary
Powered by GitBook

© Equal Care Co-op Ltd 2025

On this page

Was this helpful?

Export as PDF
  1. Evaluation framework
  2. The Toolbox
  3. Equal Care Coop's Social Climate Survey
  4. Interpreting Well-being, Relationships & Belonging Measures

Medium Score Interpretation

A medium score in the Well-being, Relationships & Belonging Outcome Domain indicates moderate success in creating a nurturing and inclusive environment, with room for improvement. This score suggests that while some elements are in place, they are not fully optimized or equitably distributed.

This situation is characterized by several key factors:

Positive thoughts and feelings, strong social connections, and clear thinking are present but not widespread amongst members. Some team members experience periods of optimism and energy, while others may feel unsupported or cynical at times. The social climate supports well-being to some extent, but there is a need for more consistent and equitable support to ensure everyone thrives.

Care and support workers have a mix of good and bad days. Sometimes they feel optimistic and supported, but other times they feel neglected. This inconsistency affects their decision-making and problem-solving. Access to resources and support varies, impacting their overall well-being. While there are some positive elements, more consistent support is needed.

"Some days are good, some not so much. I do feel optimistic and supported at times, but it’s not always consistent. Sometimes I feel a bit neglected, which makes decision-making harder. The resources and support we get are hit or miss. Overall, we have a decent foundation, but we need more consistent support."

Care receivers experience intermittent positive emotions and social relationships. While there are moments of support and clarity, they also encounter times of neglect and uncertainty. The inconsistency in access to resources and opportunities affects their overall mental and emotional well-being. Decision-making and autonomy are sometimes hindered by these fluctuations, indicating a need for more reliable and comprehensive support to fully realize their well-being.

"There are times when I feel supported and optimistic, but it’s not always steady. Sometimes I get the help I need, but other times I feel left out or uncertain. The resources and support come and go, which affects my well-being. I think there’s a good start, but we need more reliable support."

Family members, friends, and volunteers have varying experiences. They feel optimistic and supported at times, but not always. Inconsistent access to resources impacts their participation and engagement in the care process. They occasionally feel neglected or disconnected, highlighting a need for more consistent efforts to foster their well-being.

"I have mixed feelings. Sometimes I feel positive and connected, but other times not so much. The support and resources we get aren’t always there, which can make it tough to stay involved. I feel like we have the basics, but we could use more consistent effort to keep us engaged and supported."

Positive thoughts and feelings, strong social connections, and clear thinking are present but not widespread amongst circle members. Some circle members experience periods of optimism and energy, while others may feel unsupported or cynical at times. The social climate supports well-being to some extent, but there is a need for more consistent and equitable support to ensure everyone thrives.

"Strong social connections, and clear thinking are present but not widespread. Some of us experience periods of optimism and energy, while others may feel unsupported or cynical at times. The social climate supports well-being to some extent, but we need more consistent and equitable support to ensure everyone thrives."

Supportive and empathetic caregiving relationships exist but are not uniformly applied. Power imbalances still affect some interactions, preventing fully mutual empowerment and strong relational dynamics.

Care and support workers have some good relationships with care recipients, but power imbalances still make it difficult to fully connect and empower them.

"I have some good relationships with care recipients, but there are still power imbalances that make it difficult to fully connect and empower them."

Care receivers find that some caregivers are supportive and empathetic, but not all. There are still times when they feel disempowered and not fully understood.

"Some caregivers are supportive and empathetic, but not all. There are still times when I feel disempowered and not fully understood."

Family, Friends, and Volunteers notice that some caregiving relationships are strong and supportive, while others lack empathy and mutual respect, leading to concerns about inconsistency.

"We notice that some caregiving relationships are strong and supportive, while others lack empathy and mutual respect. This inconsistency is concerning."

Working relationships are supportive but could be better. Mutual support is not widespread amongst circle members. Trust and empathy between circle members vary. Communication is generally good but sometimes falls shorts of peoples expectations. This leads to a mix of positive and negative experiences and some level of dissatisfaction.

"Our working relationships are decent but could be better. Mutual support is generally there, but there are siginficant periods when we feel out of touch with one another or disconnected.

"There’s some trust and empathy among circle members, but it’s not always strong. Communication is okay, and we share Circle Hats, but not as effectively as we could, leading to occasional negative experiences and some dissatisfaction."

Inclusive practices and participatory decision-making are present but not fully embraced, leading to moderate group cohesion. Some individuals may still feel excluded, impacting overall group solidarity.

Care and support workers observe efforts to include everyone in decision-making and group activities, but these efforts are not always successful. Some individuals still feel left out.

"There are efforts to include everyone in decision-making and group activities, but it's not always successful. Some people still feel left out."

Care receivers sometimes feel included in group activities and decisions, but not always. There is still room for improvement in making everyone feel like they belong.

"I sometimes feel included in group activities and decisions, but not always. There's still room for improvement in making everyone feel like they belong."

Family members and friends see some efforts to create a sense of community and inclusion, but it is not fully realized. Their loved ones sometimes feel part of the group, but other times feel isolated.

"We see some efforts to create a sense of community and inclusion, but it's not fully realized. Our loved ones sometimes feel part of the group, but other times they feel isolated."

Circles with medium scores have moderate levels of group unity and cohesion. While there is a general sense of belonging, occasional conflicts or communication issues may arise. Efforts to foster unity are present but not always consistent or effective. The distributed decision-making authority is partially effective.

"We have a decent sense of group unity and cohesion. We mostly feel like we belong, but sometimes conflicts or communication issues pop up. We try to foster unity, but it's not always consistent or effective. Sharing decision-making power works okay, but it could be better."

Opportunities for community connection and social support are available but may not be fully accessible to all. Additional efforts are required to facilitate broader community integration and strengthen the sense of belonging.

Care and support workers see some opportunities to connect care recipients with the broader community, but not everyone can access these opportunities. More effort is needed to make these connections happen.

"There are some opportunities to connect care recipients with the broader community, but not everyone can access them. More effort is needed to make these connections happen."

Care receivers have some opportunities to connect with the broader community, but it is not always easy. They wish for more support to help them feel connected and included.

"I have some opportunities to connect with the broader community, but it's not always easy. I wish there were more support to help me feel connected and included."

Family members and friends appreciate the opportunities for their loved ones to connect with the community, but feel that it is not always enough. More support and facilitation are needed to strengthen these connections.

"We appreciate the opportunities for our loved ones to connect with the community, but it's not always enough. More support and facilitation are needed to strengthen these connections."

Circles with medium scores show moderate success in community connection and belonging. While there are some efforts to connect members with local resources and community networks, these initiatives are not fully developed or consistent.

"We do okay with community connection and belonging. There are some efforts to link us with local resources and community networks, but these efforts aren't fully developed or consistent."

Overall, a medium score reflects a social climate with foundational elements for well-being, relationships, and belonging, yet highlights the need for more equitable and comprehensive approaches to fully support all individuals.

PreviousLow Score InterpretationNextHigh Score Interpretation

Last updated 10 months ago

Was this helpful?